- Joined
- Feb 25, 2007
- Messages
- 8,360
Maybe,But the more you look for it the more your chance of finding it.HAuCl4 said:Luck is not of he who looks for it but of he who finds it!.
mic said:Maybe,But the more you look for it the more your chance of finding it.HAuCl4 said:Luck is not of he who looks for it but of he who finds it!.
Knowledge is the key here.I have done volumes of research on places that I want to metal detect and it has paid off.But you can't "find" luck if you don't get off your butt and look for it.
.GrailSeeker said:Contrary to popular belief the more ancient something is it doesn't always cost a fortune. Especially if they were struck in thousands. I am just stuck at the fact that a roman helmet would cost as much as 3 million british pounds. Unless it belonged to a guy called say Julius?
I could imagine people with large metal detectors scavenging all around Athens :lol: Under these millions of tons of concrete put throughout the years who knows what lies. The metro stations are full of them. The 'mole rat' was stopping every now an then when they came across an ancient graveyard, temple you name it! :shock:
You've missed the point completely. How many items would one find by using *no* metal detector?blueduck said:I for the most part have stayed away from metal detecting, it is time consuming and if a fella dont have the "right" and newest tool for the ground he is working, then he can scan right over a valuable object, which is not to say that someone with the newest and latest gadget out there who is not running it correctly is gonna find it either.
Enter your email address to join: