Mystery metal left after alluvial Au refine

Gold Refining Forum

Help Support Gold Refining Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Cozza

Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2019
Messages
23
Good afternoon all,
So I'm hoping someone can help identify a mystery metal. I was given some alluvial gold to run by a friend yesterday. It was a very dull colour and from an area that is known for its lower purity ( around 90%)
Now I proceeded in deliberately going a non ideal route to refine this lot as I have done gold the correct way and wanted to throw myself a learning curve.
All went exactly as expected.
Method-
-Cleaned, dried and incinerated the 11.27grm of flakes.
- placed in Hcl and heated, then added small amounts of nitric till no reaction occurred.
As expected some silver chloride formed during this process and I was left with a good amount of grey flakes.
I poured off the liquid through the filter and rinsed the silver chloride off the remaining grey flakes and filtered.
I proceeded with the gold drop and ended up with 7.27grm of gold powder and none left in solution according to a stannous test.
Now, I dried the left over grey flakes and proceeded to melt it to get a weight. At first it appeared to be silver with a tiny of copper. 2.78grm in weight.
I have then re melted to make shot as I thought I would digest this in dilute nitric to see if any gold was left behind. To my surprise there was no fizzing reaction with nitric even after 1 hr. It did turn the metal a coppery colour. I added a tiny silver crystal and it fizzled away instantly.

I have photographed the tarnished cornflake to illustrate.
I have then re melted and ended up with a button with a dull gray / purple tinge on top and the bottom is bright silver. It melted within 1min with a mapp torch.

Last photo is after I applied a drop of 68% nitric on the bottom of the button. It left a patch of copper tone and patches of purple but no reaction to the surrounding areas.

I would love some insight on what this might be.
Thank you for your time and consideration
 

Attachments

  • PSX_20190727_163607.jpg
    PSX_20190727_163607.jpg
    159.4 KB
  • PSX_20190727_163651.jpg
    PSX_20190727_163651.jpg
    130.6 KB
  • PSX_20190727_163733.jpg
    PSX_20190727_163733.jpg
    61.8 KB
  • PSX_20190727_163814.jpg
    PSX_20190727_163814.jpg
    74.8 KB
  • PSX_20190727_163904.jpg
    PSX_20190727_163904.jpg
    68.6 KB
Ok, so now I've had a break and cleared my mind here is my new train of thought.
Upon researching gold from this location, I have found old news articles from the late 1800's on the gold found in the area this lot came from. They mention the miners referring to some being electrum. 60% gold. So if my learnings off the forum are on track, this would mean what i have left here contains too much gold for nitric to penetrate, and too much silver for AR to deal with. Therefore i should inquart what i have left to finish the job.
Am i on the right track?
 
Cozza said:
Ok, so now I've had a break and cleared my mind here is my new train of thought.
Upon researching gold from this location, I have found old news articles from the late 1800's on the gold found in the area this lot came from. They mention the miners referring to some being electrum. 60% gold. So if my learnings off the forum are on track, this would mean what i have left here contains too much gold for nitric to penetrate, and too much silver for AR to deal with. Therefore i should inquart what i have left to finish the job.
Am i on the right track?

Sounds easy enough to try a test on a small sample.
 
And that, boys and girls, is why we perform field tests on samples before we start processing larger batches, even on placer gold.

Time for more coffee.
 
Here are the results
8.12grm twice refined and most of the silver recovered.
Great learning exercise.
 

Attachments

  • PSX_20190728_192131.jpg
    PSX_20190728_192131.jpg
    93.3 KB
  • PSX_20190728_192016.jpg
    PSX_20190728_192016.jpg
    98.4 KB

Latest posts

Back
Top