NEED TO ELIMINATE LEAD

Gold Refining Forum

Help Support Gold Refining Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
If I may be straight with you here. Your problem isn't the $6000 to do the job. Your problem is that you are basing your numbers on an XRF reading. Until you have a proper assay that confirms your estimates the alloy has only a notional value.

Then you're also in the trap that happens in the US where proper assays cost an arm and a leg. If I had that over here I could get an assay on that for under £100 assuming of course all the material was the same. At that point I could then go to 5 people and see who would give me the best payout up front based upon the assay results.

If you can do the job for less than $6,000 yourself and you're 100% sure that your XRF is correct then do crack on. If you want a second opinion do feel free to send me 2g of representative material and I'll happily have the assays run for you at cost. At least then you'll know where you stand.

Regards

Jon
 
If you only have induction melters, you lack the capacity to effectively smelt off the lead.

Lead has a low vapor temperature, so it "steams" off. Not something you want to play with if you aren't absolutely positive you have perfect ventilation, and that your ventilation is scrubbed prior to exhausting into the atmosphere.

Honestly, if you aren't set up to refine it already, or smelt it....sell it and take the hit.

You need a proper assay either way. If xrf, your sample needs to be free of lead. The xrf also needs to be better than a handheld model. The sensors in the handheld models do not have the spectral precision to differentiate between elements that have similar brehmstrung energies. Plus, the software making the interpretation also makes the assumption that you have precious metal, when in fact you may just have scrap.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
anachronism said:
You say the lot is worth $22k - but surely that is just based on your own readings correct or have the refinery assayed it themselves as well?

Of course. i mentioned it on average just to show the ratio between the value of the bar and the fees,,
 
What are you calling a penalty? I think what you mean is they are willing to pay you for the pt, but they aren't willing to pay out on the gold and the silver. Are you basing the $6,000 dollar penalty on the basis of being paid for all metals?
 
I’m not sure if your saying the refinery is willing to pay $22000 or that it’s that less $6000, if the former don’t bother with any processing as the best figure I could come to was around $23000 assuming the readings are correct...
 
The way i understand it is he's saying the bar value is $28,000 the way he is valuing it which sounds like pay out on all metals. Then they are penalizing him $6,000 which would make the refineries offer at $22,000 which seems like the payout on the pt portion minus any other metals. That's my thinking anyway.
 
Refineries regularly "penalize" you if your alloy falls outside of a standard category. For exsmple, cadmium in an alloy means that they can't just melt, pin, and report...they have to do an acid digestion.

With lead, they will need to process the material prior to an assay. Lead causes stratification in the sample, so it's more difficult to sample a melt and it doesn't just fit right in to one of their standard material categories (karat scrap, 1-5% Au, dental, silver, etc) So it costs them a lot more to process.

So if he just melts it with borax, how much of the lead will report in the slags vs vaporize off??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Palladium said:
What are you calling a penalty? I think what you mean is they are willing to pay you for the pt, but they aren't willing to pay out on the gold and the silver. Are you basing the $6,000 dollar penalty on the basis of being paid for all metals?


well,we get paid 98% of our PT on our regular platinum lots which is a very good rate ( PT must be >80%, even if it is less than 80% they take another 2%) . refineries do not want to deal with lead. this particular one wants to pay us 65% of it with $1000 lot charge. that adds up to roughly $6K. I hope I was able to explain better.
 
The explanation of the rates made me think of another option. Add about another 25% by weight as silver and part in nitric acid. A small percentage of the Platinum will dissolve with the silver but most will not. The Platinum and Gold will remain after parting.

Next cement the silver on copper. The copper will drop the silver and any Pt that dissolved. Now you guys are saying that I'm repeating myself and to this point I am but..... do not mix the cemented silver with the parted Pt and Au, that will lower the % of Pt and get you the lower rate. Ship them a button of Gold and Platinum, and a separate bar of the cemented silver to get the higher rates because the purity is higher.
 
Do you really need to add extra silver? The amount of silver + copper + lead is 81%, platinum + nickel + gold is 19%. I put nickel in the hard to dissolve column as it sometimes is hard to dissolve in nitric acid as a solid metal, but in this alloy it will probably be easily dissolved.

The drawback of dissolving / cementing is to treat all the acid waste afterwards. But $6000 pays for a lot of waste hauling.
... and the Big Freaking Red Cloud of NOx released while dissolving the metal. An acid proof fume hood with scrubbing is recommended.

Göran
 
g_axelsson said:
Do you really need to add extra silver? The amount of silver + copper + lead is 81%, platinum + nickel + gold is 19%. I put nickel in the hard to dissolve column as it sometimes is hard to dissolve in nitric acid as a solid metal, but in this alloy it will probably be easily dissolved.

The drawback of dissolving / cementing is to treat all the acid waste afterwards. But $6000 pays for a lot of waste hauling.
... and the Big Freaking Red Cloud of NOx released while dissolving the metal. An acid proof fume hood with scrubbing is recommended.

Göran
we are equipped with polypropylene fume hood and caustic scrubbers..should not be a problem. running a test run with 100dwt to see the result..

thanks
 
4metals said:
The explanation of the rates made me think of another option. Add about another 25% by weight as silver and part in nitric acid. A small percentage of the Platinum will dissolve with the silver but most will not. The Platinum and Gold will remain after parting.

Next cement the silver on copper. The copper will drop the silver and any Pt that dissolved. Now you guys are saying that I'm repeating myself and to this point I am but..... do not mix the cemented silver with the parted Pt and Au, that will lower the % of Pt and get you the lower rate. Ship them a button of Gold and Platinum, and a separate bar of the cemented silver to get the higher rates because the purity is higher.

do you think %50 Ag is not rich enough for nitric to work properly that I should add more? My other question is I am not sure how much Pt would dissolve with it? if it is only few dwt i could live with that. if i ship the silver with very little pt in it I would not get paid on it for sure because refineries has minimum deductions,( 0.25ozt of any secondary metal). if more Pt dissolves, I will have to reduce it with ammonium chrolide..
 
Why not ship with just enough + Pt so that you get paid on it? You should always adjust your melt so you have enough in it to get paid on it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
It's hard to say how much Platinum will pass into the nitric acid with the silver, it's not supposed to be soluble in nitric acid but the silver affects its solubility. I have never heard any hard fast numbers as there are likely a lot of different parameters that can influence the quantity digested. From the old assayers books the rule of thumb is if there is 10 times the quantity of Silver over Platinum, some of the Platinum will dissolve with the silver. It isn't ounces but it can be pennyweights.

Adding Platinum to get up the concentration is a theory that can backfire on you. Sure you may get it above the concentration threshold and make it payable but then the minimum Platinum deduction, often 1 ounce, will kick in so it can cost you in the long run.

Out of curiosity, does your XRF read the same on the top of the bar and the bottom? That is a huge problem melting higher temperature melting metals with low temperature melting metals. Usually a lot of copper is added to make it homogeneous.
 
4metals said:
It's hard to say how much Platinum will pass into the nitric acid with the silver, it's not supposed to be soluble in nitric acid but the silver affects its solubility. I have never heard any hard fast numbers as there are likely a lot of different parameters that can influence the quantity digested. From the old assayers books the rule of thumb is if there is 10 times the quantity of Silver over Platinum, some of the Platinum will dissolve with the silver. It isn't ounces but it can be pennyweights.

Adding Platinum to get up the concentration is a theory that can backfire on you. Sure you may get it above the concentration threshold and make it payable but then the minimum Platinum deduction, often 1 ounce, will kick in so it can cost you in the long run.

Out of curiosity, does your XRF read the same on the top of the bar and the bottom? That is a huge problem melting higher temperature melting metals with low temperature melting metals. Usually a lot of copper is added to make it homogeneous.

i drilled the bar from ten different location and gathered the dill dust in a plastic bag and took the xrf readings. I never read the top and the bottom of it. I am sure though the top will read lead heavy. i will check it tomorrow at the office and post the results here. i plan on decimating the bar to almost dust with large press drill to speed up the digestion process and efficiency anyways.
Regards
 
snoman701 said:
Why not ship with just enough + Pt so that you get paid on it? You should always adjust your melt so you have enough in it to get paid on it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

we have 50ozt of PT,PD scrapt jewelry waiting to be shipped for this process to be done. we will do so.))))
 
4metals said:
It's hard to say how much Platinum will pass into the nitric acid with the silver, it's not supposed to be soluble in nitric acid but the silver affects its solubility. I have never heard any hard fast numbers as there are likely a lot of different parameters that can influence the quantity digested.
https://archive.org/stream/bub_gb_sok6AAAAMAAJ#page/n8/mode/1up
Same one on scribd.com https://www.scribd.com/document/377664093/Platinum-Silver-Alloys

Richard,
 
Back
Top