rfergman said:
Harold, taking your surgeon analogy one step further....no, you cant read how to remove an appendix, and then perofrm as a surgeon. You usually have an experienced surgeon standing there offering advice and guidance until you fully understand.
Prior to that, however, one has spent countless numbers of years studying. That's the point. We expect readers to do that, for which they are rewarded with assistance when it's needed.
I do not consider that unreasonable.
"Gold refiners helping one another, worldwide!"
Yep. Key, here, is the word *refiners*-----but no mention of gold refiners helping *all comers*, world wide. Please do not misconstrue the meaning. We do not cater to those who refuse to learn the basics. We often bend over backwards for those who have done their best. Please be mindful that copping an attitude on this forum generally results in a very short stay.
rfergman said:
After reading here for well over a year, I knew better than to ask a question. Tucking my tail between my legs and crawling back into the weeds (probably to never ask a question again)
Please understand that I'm not unsympathetic, but we have no way of knowing which of the readers have done their homework, and which have not. We get an overwhelming number of individuals that come here with not the least bit of knowledge, then demand they be told how to do everything, in the mean time not doing so much as lifting a finger, aside from using one to tap out their request (demand).
It is my opinion that if a person that has done due diligence and has hit a wall, that they should state their case exactly as it is. There's no crime in not understanding a process, in particular when it has been given considerable attention. We don't all grasp things equally, with some coming around quickly, while others may stumble along the way. I have been contacted numerous times by PM, requesting guidance. I'm fine with that (time permitting) and gladly help, but I fully expect that the individual in question is trying by reading Hoke, as well as other useful books. Some have asked me to dictate to them, privately, what is already in print. Why they can't read it from Hoke instead of expecting me to re-write her book is hard for me to understand.
So then, if you have hit a wall, please state it in those words, or words of your choosing. Someone will point you in the right direction. Be certain to make mention that you have read Hoke, as well as anything else you can find that pertains to the subject matter, but make damned sure you have done so. It doesn't take long to figure out a guy that is BS'ing his way ---by the questions that are asked.
Want to give it another try? We're not as hard hearted as you may think.
Harold