mls26cwru said:
http://books.google.com/books?id=1-9GAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA357&lpg=PA357&dq=copper+chloride+flux+toughening+gold&source=bl&ots=_Ght53BTeT&sig=JRLbqI6oJb4R1GSreSDU78ZRWF0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=DKqKUsTWJoaN2gWCo4CYAw&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=copper%20chloride%20flux%20toughening%20gold&f=false
interesting tidbit i found looking around for more information about this... I would like to try it, but definitely think Harold's washing procedures are far and away a safer option!
Even careful washing may not remove some of the contamination, is it is often bound securely within the precipitated gold, and dragged down.
I'm very narrow of mind where the purity of gold is concerned. For me, it was of upper importance for my gold to be above question, as virtually all of it was put back in use in the way of jewelry. Benchmen are not thrilled to discover that the gold they use has problems, as they often cast hand carved waxes, so their hard work is lost.
I fully understand that a guy isn't likely to produce 9999 quality, but there's little reason to settle for less than the industry standard of 9995, and it's not all that hard to achieve. You most likely would exceed that degree of purity with just a little more effort.
I tried the niter process early on, and was never pleased with the results. They may have been evident by assay, but so far as the behavior of the gold, it wasn't. I wanted to see a glistening surface n my molten gold, which I never achieved without a second refining. Even prolonged washing, alone, did not improve the gold, depending on how dirty it was. When I resorted to a second refining, the results were drastically improved, often with the contamination that was removed quite evident in the barren solution.
If you are really concerned abut purity, don't rely on a single refining, not unless your gold chloride solution is very clean, and it often is not. A second refining will do wonders, as the traces of contaminants that have the potential to be dragged down are significantly reduced.
Harold