Iridium, Osmium, Ruthenium, Rhenium and Palladium

[CHARLIE GREENLER]

Here is a good site for the Jade Cove area.......www.hikinginbigsur.com/hikes_jadecove.com.I dont take any tools ,I just surface colect and sometimes I scrabble in the sand a bit.There can be jade with platnum in it ,I forgot to mention orbicular material and some chrysocola.I did find out that some of the material there is called POLLYMETALIC SULFIDE ORE,I believe it in some cases has gone supper or alltered itself making it a complex pollymetalic sulfide/phosphate (thats an idea its not necisaraly accurate).You all know someone has to find a name for this material.SO WHAT IF ITS A POLY METALIC !!!!!Whats its name?????????????I have a couple other rocks,minerals,thing that had potential for new elements but that make awsome specimins and one is called wad manganese,that sounds bad,I am naming it OGDONITE (ITS BOTRYOIDAL MATERIAL),but thats a diferent location.Hay ,if the collage tests it and the name of the stuff comes back unknown ,whynot give it a name!!!!!! These gold ,silver and PGM bearing materials need definate names !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[jimdoc]

No pictures yet Charlie?

Jim

 

[Richard36]

Charlie, you sound like a "Carnival Barker" if I ever heard one.
Show us some photos of this stuff and quit fishing for "Suckers".

 

[Harold_V]

Charlie, you sound like a "Carnival Barker" if I ever heard one.
Show us some photos of this stuff and quit fishing for "Suckers".

<<<<<snicker>>>>>

You know, I generally don't like readers taking shots at other readers, but his guy has gone on and on about his "discoveries" with not so much as a respectable answer to any questions tendered. Just more and more unsubstantiated claims, and right under the noses of those that might know, who would easily be able to verify. That troubles me. Sort of makes me think maybe ol' Charlie isn't shooting straight with the readers.

Can't speak for others, but I'm getting a little tired of the same old "carnival barker" lines. I expect Charlie is going to start being more forthcoming of pictures, or he may find himself on the outside, looking in, no longer able to post his diatribe. So then, Charlie, if you're trying to get people fired up, it's working, but perhaps not as you had hoped.

We try to run an upfront site here, where people expect the truth, and are not promoted by tales that may be not quite what they may appear to be. If we allow that to change, you can expect the reputation that has been earned to be lost. I don't want to see that happen.

How 'bout it, Charlie? Which is it going to be?

Harold