Molten gold will bond to almost all metals, and forms alloys with many of them readily. A note of caution: do not melt precious metals in any kind of metallic vessel, not under any circumstance. Molten metals are strong solvents, and will dissolve other metals, even well under their melting points.Arcani said:newb here
have hobby furnace and crucible, Will gold bond with other metals when melted?
Only in rare circumstances, but even then all you do is make it transfer to an element with which it enjoys a more comfortable life. For example, if you had an alloy of iron and gold, you could separate the gold from the iron/gold mix by melting the lot with silver. Silver has a greater affinity for gold than does iron, so the silver would gather the gold. When it was poured in a mold, there would be stratification, with a layer of silver and gold alloyed on the bottom, a layer of iron on top, then a layer of sulfides (assuming there were any in the heat), then a layer of flux. Silver and iron do not alloy, or do so very poorly.can it be seperated by meltin?
i've read the tutorial, could the chemical process outlined be complemented by smelting of some sort
I know of only silver, but that's only because I am not a metallurgist, nor have I had need to explore your question before. There may be other metals that behave in the same manner. The Parks process, I believe, is another, but it does not pertain to separating values from iron. I commented on silver only as an example.Arcani said:will only silver work?
Wrong approach. The yield from Thermite is steel, which I wouldn't consider a collector of values. Don't know that anyone would, not for gold, silver or copper.considering the 2 oz/ton for boards(maybe less) could thermite be used to melt down all of the mass? ( enviro concerns for sure, smoke is nasty)
Again, wrong approach. AR should not be looked upon to eliminate base metals, which would be the vast majority of elements you'd recover from melted boards. You must address the base metals before thinking of using AR. There are exceptions, but working with copper laden low grade scrap isn't one of them.would a thermite contaminated mass desolve properly in AR?
Superimposing an AC current on top of a DC current has been known to be used when parting alloys that have a high percentage of contaminants that would build a layer that became a barrier to the flow of the desired element, but I don't know that you'd gain much in a stripping cell. Problem with stripping is that gold that is buried under solder or otherwise masked, is not recovered. That's one of the reasons the "big boys" melt boards. The most value is recovered by that process.Arcani said:would rigging the board to oscilate help or speed the cell striping process?
It works fine if you carry the operation to conclusion, which would be to get ALL of the base metals in solution, along with the values. Two ready problems here would be that the traces of gold that are present would be heavily contaminated when precipitated from solution because of the ratio of values compared to the ratio of base metals. That's not a significant problem in that gold can be re-processed once precipitated, which would improve its quality.why won't just dipping in AR work if it attacks the gold?
Then recovering precious metals isn't for you. Regardless of your approach, you have to use chemicals. You can not recover and purify values without them. If, by chance, you come up with a way, you'll have revolutionized the refining industry.i don't think i'm to interested in playing with the chemicals, not until there's a faster and easyer way to harvest, so thats where i think i will play around for now
That's nothing new. That process is known as induction heating. A microwave oven works on a similar, if not identical, principle. Induction furnaces, while quite primitive, were developed in the early 1900's, using a spark gap to create high frequency. Modern induction furnaces are solid state, and very efficient. As their size increases, so to does frequency. Huge induction furnaces operate at line frequency (60 Hz).ever seen AmericanAntigravity.com?
people are playing with EM feilds and getting some interesting effects
like melting metel
I came to that conclusion long ago, and worked to that end. It worked for me, and worked well.But it seems like karet jewery is prob the only way to make eny money in refining gold
How do you propose to recover the values? It may work in principle in that you'd get the entire mass in solution, but that wouldn't get you any closer to extracting the values.off post topic but on platinum, it has a high melt point, what would happen if the hdd disc's where heated short of platinums melting point?
would the pt be desolved by the metel on which it's plated when it got molten?
Where recovering precious metals from molten solutions is concerned, with VERY rare exception, you can forget stratification. You aren't going to enjoy success hoping to skim values from the top----they're generally heavier than the base metals, and if they are inclined to alloy, you can't separate them with gravity.Arcani said:i was hoping that the platinum would float on top or could be collected from the molten metel with a rod of some perticular material
platinum plate, hdd hard drive diskWhere recovering precious metals from molten solutions is concerned, with VERY rare exception, you can forget stratification
top left corner of p table right?you don't know, platinum is one of the heaviest of elements, about 10% heavier than gold.
The other piece of advise I'd like to offer you is to quit coming up with bizarre notions
I'm going to say something that I've said, time and again.
Buy Hoke's book.
Do not misunderstand my comments. What I'm trying to do is prevent you from chasing your tail------and to learn some of the basics, so you understand what you can expect when attempting refining. If you pursue avenues known to fail, the only thing you're going to learn is nothing works.Arcani said:i thank u for your constructive critisisum and all the time u have spent replying to my questions, and hope u will decline to answer if it is frustrating or anoying to u
thank u for your response peter. I think i failed to make my point in that last reply, which is my fault. I hear exactly what u and Harold are saying.
I'm sorry i can't explain it in a more coheirent manner, as i am not that smart. i hope i have not offended enyone, and again say that if my post is not worth replying to i won't get pissy if u don't. I will format future responces in a effert to reduce misinterpratation.
respectfully
Landless Peasent
Videos, for me, are out off the question. I am on a dialup that connects @ 26.4 kbps. It takes far more time to download anything of substance than I can afford to lose. It's not that I'm not interested-----so I'd welcome further comments if you think they'd be useful.Arcani said:Harold
did u watch the video?
You likely know that I had no comments about your command of the English language. I'm not here to teach English-----just refining. If I can help you, or anyone, in that regard, that's my purpose. Meet me half way and things work real well.maybe this will help
thank u for your response peter. I think i failed to make my point in that last reply, which is my fault. I hear exactly what u and Harold are saying.
I'm sorry i can't explain it in a more coheirent manner, as i am not that smart. i hope i have not offended enyone, and again say that if my post is not worth replying to i won't get pissy if u don't. I will format future responces in a effert to reduce misinterpratation.
respectfully
Landless Peasent
also; print is dead ,..... sorry :roll:
Enter your email address to join: