Yes, I would like to see it as well.If you want I can make up a similar drawing for the vacuum by venturi setup
Yes, I would like to see it as well.If you want I can make up a similar drawing for the vacuum by venturi setup
i found a few things i wanted to run by you after studying your drawing for a minute i found a circulating vacuum pump that basically does what you have illustrated but what i didnt see on the machine or in any reference was how to apply something to take care of the fugitive fumes the scrubbers miss im guessing thats the blue vent in your diagram? i also found these gas scrubber glass pieces and some medium i was hoping you could evaluate the setup and let me know how to construct it and what else i might need ill use caustic lie and water in one scrubber and hydrogen peroxide and water in the second with the third being emptyAnd all together it would look like this.
View attachment 63696
I would connect the piping between the tubes with clear heavy vinyl tubing so you can see if red NOx passes over. (telling you to check your scrubber chemistry)
The tubes are filled 90% of their volume with tower packing like bio balls or something similar.
Why an empty container? And why use the caustic solution in the first one? Looking back at the whole post it has been mentioned to use distilled water and peroxide in the first, and caustic in the last two. By using the H2O/peroxide first it captures some NOx and converts to a weak nitric acid solution, making it reusable. The last two can work at neutralizing the remaining fumes before releasing them back into the atmosphere.ill use caustic lie and water in one scrubber and hydrogen peroxide and water in the second with the third being empty
The first could be empty as a water trap to prevent backflow into the reaction vessel.Why an empty container? And why use the caustic solution in the first one? Looking back at the whole post it has been mentioned to use distilled water and peroxide in the first, and caustic in the last two. By using the H2O/peroxide first it captures some NOx and converts to a weak nitric acid solution, making it reusable. The last two can work at neutralizing the remaining fumes before releasing them back into the atmosphere.
The reason there are 3 tubes 48" long is to give the necessary retention time in the area where the NOx is reacting. 3 tubes is a good number for a 10 CFM venturi. If you are concerned about back-flow a small 1 liter vacuum flask between the reaction flask and the first cylinder would be better.The first could be empty as a water trap to prevent backflow into the reaction vessel.
Why an empty container? And why use the caustic solution in the first one? Looking back at the whole post it has been mentioned to use distilled water and peroxide in the first, and caustic in the last two. By using the H2O/peroxide first it captures some NOx and converts to a weak nitric acid solution, making it reusable. The last two can work at neutralizing the remaining fumes before releasing them back into the atmosphere.
Can you please keep your posts on this subject in one thread?thank you for clearing that up for me i have read what your saying i didnt understand the reasoning behind that order. that also answers a question i posted elswhere i do appreciate it. can you tell me the concentrations of peroxide and lye or do those matter? i have 6 percent lab grade hydrogen peroxide and lye granules
This is great 4metals! Thanks for posting this. I’m looking to build a fume hood and potentially use a similar design for neutralizing the NOx gases. Do you know how effective your system is at this? How often do you have to change each solution?View attachment 63727
I put them all together and resized them so they are close (not to scale) to what the setup will look like. The main red pipe is inch and a half PVC and the drops 1". The piping thru the scrubber is still 1/2" but the flow is less restricted in the larger pipe.
The blue line is vacuum and is selected at the valve by the vacuum generator. Each 1/2" vacuum port needs a shut off valve and a PVC barbed fitting.
The fatter pipe provides a vacuum reservoir but when you shut the system, that reservoir can suck water from the reservoir and flood the pipes and become a general pain to deal with. The vent valve by the vac generator solves that. Open it to drop the vacuum and then shut the pump and it will not draw water.
I also have the tubes about 18" off the floor so a bucket can go underneath them to drain into when changing fluids.
I am a bit confused.I don't remember who it was that said they used a traffic cone as a coupler but you sir are a god among men. Just need to pipe it to the roof now using 6"PVC with a PVC roof cap and I'm still waiting on the flasks for the wet vacuum scrubber but it's coming along nicely!
It's a corrosion resistant PVC fan it's made for chemical fume hoods so I didn't see a reason to not have the fan directly pulling fumes there was one metal bolt and nut inside the fan that I covered in silicon. The cone I used as a coupler on my 10 to 6 reducer.I am a bit confused.
Aren't you just sucking through the fan here?
Where is your cone?
Then there is no need for the traffic cone.It's a corrosion resistant PVC fan it's made for chemical fume hoods so I didn't see a reason to not have the fan directly pulling fumes there was one metal bolt and nut inside the fan that I covered in silicon. The cone I used as a coupler on my 10 to 6 reducer.
I tried to plumb it that way as well as a few others and I got back draft instead of the Venturi effect so I decided to go with a direct vent system and beefed up the wet scrubber design. But when I got the fan on top of the hood the exhaust was smaller than any coupler I had so I used a traffic cone as a means to connect my 10 to 6 reducer to the fan it's self I never would have thought about using a cone with out one of the members here. I will be using a wye joint and adding on a booster fan directly over the exhaust to my vacuum pump and that will work to capture any left over fumes from the wet scrubber as well as add fresh air to the mix while exhausting out of my roof.Then there is no need for the traffic cone.
The purpose for the traffic cone is to create a restriction,
so one can utilize the venturi effect to suck from the hood without dragging the corrosive fumes through the fan.
Just a word of caution here, check the temperature of that motor that drives your blower. I had not one, but TWO, of those things reaching very high temps very quickly. When I emailed the amazon seller they tried to tell me the unit had thermal protection, but it was over 200 degrees in a very short amount of time and nothing was triggered. I bought a second one, exact unit somewhere else, same thing.It's a corrosion resistant PVC fan it's made for chemical fume hoods so I didn't see a reason to not have the fan directly pulling fumes there was one metal bolt and nut inside the fan that I covered in silicon. The cone I used as a coupler on my 10 to 6 reducer.
Enter your email address to join: