jimdoc
Well-known member
bswartzwelder said:I hope I live upwind of him.
I think he is in Dubai, so I think your safe.
Jim
bswartzwelder said:I hope I live upwind of him.
:lol: scared are we! just kidding, :mrgreen:bswartzwelder said:I hope I live upwind of him.
Of interest should be the fact that cyanide is NOT a refining process, as it is not selective. If you process with cyanide, both silver and gold will be dissolved, as will base metals, assuming you aren't using a very dilute cyanide solution. Cyanide is used for EXTRACTION, not refining. As has been alluded, for the most part, it has no place in the hobby refinery. There are other means to the ends desired.JHS said:i came across a tutorial that explained in depth the process of Cyanide.i read through it and bookmarked it.
i was not intrested in it other than how the process worked.
the amazing part of it was at the end of the tutorial there was an order form along with a form for a permit to buy
the Cyanide for the purpose of hobby gold refining.
Harold_V said:Of interest should be the fact that cyanide is NOT a refining process, as it is not selective. ... ...
kjavanb123 said:.......
Antidote of 1% sodium thiosulphate solution and amytl nitrite pearls all availale per hook insttuctiins.
The only concern I have is ........
quote]
Sodium thiosulphate 1% solution is to be administered intraveneously to the victim by another party. You don't have another party and as you'll be floundering around on the floor and turning blue you will be unable to administer it to yourself. The same goes for the amyl nitrite 'poppers'.
-----
Further, these items are NOT 'antidotes'. They are for use as FIRST AID, to keep the victim alive until the pros arrive.
------
Copper and a great many other things are more readily soluble in any given CN than is gold. You are not achieving your goal of stripping the gold efficiently when using cyanide in the presence of base metals such as you have here.
------
The folks who have responded to this thread are trying to help you reach your goal. They wish you to understand that you can recover your gold more easily , more completely, and more safely than by continuing your current procedures. They are trying to convey to you the thought that your having 'only one concern' is not compatible with their collective hundreds of years of experience that one in your situation should have a great many concerns. Why dismiss out of hand that which is so generously pro-offered?
Can they ALL be so wrong?
Freechemist,freechemist said:... From the aqueous leach-solution [Au(CN)2]- can be recovered as the metal e.g. by cementation with zinc or eventually by cathodic reduction through electrolysis. Therefor I can see no reason, to introduce an additional, and in my eyes unnecessary solvent-extraction-step befor reducing [Au(CN)2]- from the leach-solution to the metal.
That's a fact indeed, which also holds true for [Au(CN)2]- dissolved in an organic solvent, obtained after it's extraction from the original aqueous leach-solution. Thus, I still do not see an additional, in my eyes unnecessary extraction step making sense, as long as the [Au(CN)2]- involved, can be processed into a saleable product directly from the aqueous leach-solution.The currently available methods for getting gold out of cyanide leaches - zinc or carbon - require multiple further steps to get a saleable product.
Enter your email address to join: