A little forum history.
Before the forum started, some yo-yo on eBay sold a process for sulfuric stripping (and still does, I think) and, for some weird reason, he added glycerin. It's still a mystery why. We have mulled it over and over. It's certainly not needed. Sort of a placebo. Personally, I think it was added to make it unique and get a patent, which he claims to have (Probably BS. I asked him for a patent number and never got it). The forum started 5 years ago and the first big topic of conversation was the sulfuric stripper. The process discussed on the forum was basically an exact copy of the eBay guy's process. During this time, lazersteve, in his processes, added glycerin. No one, at that time, knew it wasn't needed.
The original patent of this process, done in 1940, didn't even mention glycerin.
http://www.google.com/patents/US2185858?printsec=abstract&dq=2185858&ei=OZRJT5_VNbKCsgKz-qHrCA#v=onepage&q=2185858&f=false
I joined the forum about a month after it started. I had been using the sulfuric stripper, on a large industrial scale, for many applications, since the early 70s. At one point, with jet engine scrap, I used a 250 gallon tank of concentrated sulfuric. One of the first things I noticed on the forum, was the use of glycerin. I immediately told everyone it wasn't needed, which it wasn't. Since then, many tried it without glycerin, found it worthless, and stopped using it, including Steve. For those history buffs, search out the early posts of the forum.
Just use Steve's process on his website, but FORGET ABOUT THE GLYCERIN! It will work fine.