FrugalRefiner said:
Snoman, thanks for sharing your experience. I thought the details of how the samples were prepared were particularly interesting. I will probably never process the exact same material you did, so the yield numbers aren't as significant to me as the process, but I'm only speaking for myself.
Dave
I think I'm going to do an induction melter build, so you'll get more of the process on that side. I've spent some time studying them, and was initially looking for an old one, but it's just not worth it. From a control side, there's really not much to them. It's just a PWM, phase lock loop on the feedback controlling a giant IGBT. The stupid snubber capacitors will be the expensive part.
This gentleman takes an interesting pin sample as well. He uses a piece of quartz tubing, submerges the tip in the same manor as a regular vacuum pin, then very quickly pulls a sample using a turkey baster. It's the exact same process, just a different spin. Plus, if you are lucky and the pin slides out easy, you can use the same piece of quartz tube quite a few times.
I asked him for a couple pieces of tubing and got the warning, "I make this look really easy but there is a bit of coordination to it". And after he described it, it's clear that his likely hundreds of thousands of melts over the last 30 years has taught him the muscle memory to make it appear really really easy.
Then the XRF is another amazement to me in and of itself. The more I learn, the more I love it. I spent 45 minutes today talking to him about errors, analysis of results, the differences between machines and their limitations. In time, as I gain a greater understanding of it, I'm going to write up a review of XRF and analysis of precious metals, give it to him to proof, then post it. Absolutely amazing tool. He's been using XRF, in one form or another, since 1982.