Well, there is no BS in the first couple of pages, and there are some very nice instructions, that could probably be used to build rather efficient electrolysers.
But the magic pops up rather quickly insisting that 600% to 1000% efficiency should be obtainable and that “Bob’s electronics draw energy from the environment”.
There is one nice thing about it: “The electrolysis gas is explosive” and in that, he is right. The really scientifically challenged normally insist, that the gas “implodes”, totally ignoring the Ideal Gas Law and the temperature of the combustion gas.
We’re not even talking first hands experience, but just referring to what “Bob has done”.
Oh yeah, once again I’m a slave of traditional science and agent of the oil companies.
But let’s follow that assumption, and assume:
- it really works
- the oil companies control the US government and don’t want it to be known
What would happen?
There would be a huge benefit of anything giving independence of Middle Eastern oil, and any government harnessing this technology could give OPEC the birdie.
Believe it or not, but in most of the world the governments own the oil industry, not the opposite, and both Russia and China would do anything to humiliate both OPEC and the US.
Furthermore these countries have lots of very competent scientists and a willingness to test alternative solutions.
Attempting to optimize electrolysis for a hundred years should also have given a hint that thermodynamics was not right, and electrolysis could work “wonders”
Once again, no one has ever made a “perpetual motion machine” or “free energy device” work in a controlled experiment.
Please build one, and let’s see* it work.
*See as in ”Scientifically see”
Oh, and http://www.theorionproject.org/en/breakthrough.html
"a non-profit organisation attempting to raise $ 60 million in 60 days"
:shock:
But the magic pops up rather quickly insisting that 600% to 1000% efficiency should be obtainable and that “Bob’s electronics draw energy from the environment”.
There is one nice thing about it: “The electrolysis gas is explosive” and in that, he is right. The really scientifically challenged normally insist, that the gas “implodes”, totally ignoring the Ideal Gas Law and the temperature of the combustion gas.
We’re not even talking first hands experience, but just referring to what “Bob has done”.
Oh yeah, once again I’m a slave of traditional science and agent of the oil companies.
But let’s follow that assumption, and assume:
- it really works
- the oil companies control the US government and don’t want it to be known
What would happen?
There would be a huge benefit of anything giving independence of Middle Eastern oil, and any government harnessing this technology could give OPEC the birdie.
Believe it or not, but in most of the world the governments own the oil industry, not the opposite, and both Russia and China would do anything to humiliate both OPEC and the US.
Furthermore these countries have lots of very competent scientists and a willingness to test alternative solutions.
Attempting to optimize electrolysis for a hundred years should also have given a hint that thermodynamics was not right, and electrolysis could work “wonders”
Once again, no one has ever made a “perpetual motion machine” or “free energy device” work in a controlled experiment.
Please build one, and let’s see* it work.
*See as in ”Scientifically see”
Oh, and http://www.theorionproject.org/en/breakthrough.html
"a non-profit organisation attempting to raise $ 60 million in 60 days"
:shock:
