- Joined
- Feb 25, 2007
- Messages
- 8,360
I suggest you research further. Large objects, such as extremely large pieces of ore, do not respond well to small balls. It is also well known that ball mills start with much larger balls, often as large as 6" in diameter, and have them replaced when they abrade to smaller sizes. It takes a given amount of energy to reduce the size of large objects efficiently----energy that simply isn't provided by small balls.samuel-a said:a study that i stumbled across on the web suggest that 1/2" to 5/8" balls as grinding media preform the best for... basiclly most of ball mills, regardless of their size and matter to be grinded. assuming that the mill is running on it's optimum RPM.
I would agree with your assessment, assuming the feed was small in the beginning--perhaps 1/8"-.
From personal experience----I ran my ball mill with balls that ranged from 3/4" up to 2" diameter, plus a percentage of old rollers, roughly 3/4" diameter and 1" long. Ore pieces larger than 3/4" were broken down by attrition only. A piece of gold bearing quartz roughly 1½" in size ran in the mill for days before it was reduced. My mill was something like 18" in diameter, and operated at the precise speed advised for the size. The feed I processed was sized 1/2"-, as I recall.
Harold