Buzz
Well-known member
I've been looking at these too.
Plenty of videos on You Tube.
Just search for HHO Torch
Buz
Plenty of videos on You Tube.
Just search for HHO Torch
Buz
all great points although, Not sure anyone is looking for a free lunch, Just a more economical one.Harold_V said:No question at all. If it works, it's because you have provided a method of converting energy that has been wasted to useful energy in propelling the vehicle. There is a finite amount of energy contained in any given fuel. How you use it makes the difference.eeTHr said:If this were actually scientifically tested, and found to repeatedly show a significant gain in milage, then the only question left would be why it works.
If you, and all others will keep one thing in mind, these things become self evident. It's pretty simple, although there are factions that don't want to accept the fact that "there is no free lunch". There is no perpetual motion, and one can never operate a vehicle without expending energy. If there are no other losses, there's always friction, such as the tires in contact with the road.
Harold
One of the facts of physics is that you can't change methods of storing energy without losses. That is key to the reason why you can't use an alternator for gain. Should you be so fortunate to increase mileage by a small percentage, I am of the opinion that you could accomplish the same end by a simple tuning of the engine. It makes no sense that you can get as much out as you put in----let alone more. Any way you look at this problem, you can't get more out than you put in. Nothing is going to change that----not as we know things now.james122964 said:Not sure anyone is looking for a free lunch, Just a more economical one.
Absolutely true. Anyone that thinks an alternator is putting out unused power has no clue how they operate. If they think an alternator runs without effort, they also have no clue. I used to run a 12V alternator with an 8 horse Kohler engine. Took everything the engine produced to put out the amperage required to keep three battteries charged (in a boat).Harold,
You hit the nail on the head with the power required to produce the gas(HHO)mix to add, it does not come from electricity the alternater is already generating and wasting, it makes the alternater generate more electricity, placing a heavier load on your engine, making you use more fuel.
joehast said:I also have an Hydrogen Cell, and I have built them.(Great science project) The H gas generator is a fact, there is nothing fictional about them. Of course it takes electricity to make H-gas, but if you have excess electricity why not try it.
I think these work better on older cars(w/ no computer & Cat), I have not had much success with my 2005 Focus as I have improper non-efficient combustion burning problems (sulfur smell & no increase in MPG). There is apparently a way to get around this, I'd like to know one that works.
I have made a few Torches, it's very easy. They're great for melting & cutting metals.You think Oxygen burns hot, wait till you try one of these.! It sure would be nice if a reputable manufacturer would sell these on the market. To build one you need a one way check valve & or Fine bronze wool to occupy the space in between input & output. H-gas escapes at fast velocity, much faster than Natural gas for example, so it may not be as dangerous as one might initially think in certain respects. However, if the gas backfired into your Torch or tank it could get ugly.
qst42know said:If there was any merit to this scheme, every car, on every lot, from every car maker would include one.
No, it isn't cost effective, and it never will be. If you study the basic tenets of physics, you come to understand that you can not convert energy from one form to another without losses. There is no free lunch----there is no free lunch today, there was no free lunch yesterday, and there will be no free lunch tomorrow. Anything you do to extract energy will have losses--it's a matter of choosing which one offers the least in the way of losses. The hydrogen liberated by using lye, to dissolve base metals, is no different from using HCl to dissolve steel. It, too, liberates hydrogen. You pay one hell of a price for enough to do any serious work. Remember me saying there's no free lunch?joehast said:Well, there's another way to generate H-gas w/o using electricity using Red Devil Lye. No wires and no draw from your auto's electrical system.! This is a strong alkaline so be damn careful.! The thing is, It works..! Is it cost effective.? I think so, you be the Judge.
Harold_V said:No, it isn't cost effective, and it never will be. If you study the basic tenets of physics, you come to understand that you can not convert energy from one form to another without losses. There is no free lunch----there is no free lunch today, there was no free lunch yesterday, and there will be no free lunch tomorrow. Anything you do to extract energy will have losses--it's a matter of choosing which one offers the least in the way of losses. The hydrogen liberated by using lye, to dissolve base metals, is no different from using HCl to dissolve steel. It, too, liberates hydrogen. You pay one hell of a price for enough to do any serious work. Remember me saying there's no free lunch?joehast said:Well, there's another way to generate H-gas w/o using electricity using Red Devil Lye. No wires and no draw from your auto's electrical system.! This is a strong alkaline so be damn careful.! The thing is, It works..! Is it cost effective.? I think so, you be the Judge.
If a guy claims a car that used to get 10 mpg is using hydrogen and now getting 30 mpg---you're not being told something---what you're not being told is what the question is. I don't believe it, and I wouldn't believe it if I stood before the dude. I'd have to see it for myself.
Harold
Enter your email address to join: