Justinhcase, no your right, I don't have the slightest understanding of you, the same as you don't me, or the op, but you passed a judgment before reading the whole story, you attacked me once just because I asked a question. And I'm sorry, you don't retaliate to an actual attack, you attack before anyone gets the chance. Now I know everyone is different, but why always be on the defensive all the time, what happened to innocent until proven guilty? Yes there are people who do the same things on here, and they also come and go quick enough. But I love to know where you got your qualitative testing from and how much actual research you did on the op, maybe your right, maybe he is another chancer on here, but does the world need another pitbull snarling and spitting trying to get a bite in? The attack approach is not the way forward as it always breeds attack and arrogance is not an excuse.
4metals I am exactly the same, read the whole book, don't over analyse things and you see so much more. But maybe the op isn't worth the time or maybe he struggled to understand what is going on in here!
But why label people before they have the chance to defend themselves?
Sent from my EVA-L09 using Tapatalk