Traveller11
Well-known member
From "Getting Gold: A practical treatise for prospectors, miners and students" by J.C.F. Johnson, F.G.S. (1898)
"Great improvements on this slow and imperfect method have been made of late years, among the earlier of which was that of Messrs. Newbery and Vautin. They placed the pulp with water in a gaslight revolving cylinder, into which the chlorine was introduced, and atmospheric air to a pressure of 60 lb. to the square inch was pumped in. The cylinder with its contents was revolved for two hours, then the charge was withdrawn and drained nearly dry by suction, the resultant liquid being slowly filtered through broken charcoal on which the chloride crystals were deposited, in appearance much like the bromo-chlorides of silver ore seen on some of the black manganic oxides of the Barrier silver mines. The charcoal, with its adhering chlorides, was conveyed to the smelting-house and the gold smelted into bars of extremely pure metal. Messrs. Newbery and Vautin claimed for their process decreased time for the operation with increased efficiency."
Mr. Johnson talks about filtering the gold in solution through broken charcoal, depositing the auric chloride crystals there, and then smelting the charcoal with its adhering auric chloride crystals.
Is this a basic form of the carbon adsorption method? Is it really as simple as filtering gold in solution through activated carbon (charcoal)? What becomes of the carbon during smelting, does it all get burnt off?
"Great improvements on this slow and imperfect method have been made of late years, among the earlier of which was that of Messrs. Newbery and Vautin. They placed the pulp with water in a gaslight revolving cylinder, into which the chlorine was introduced, and atmospheric air to a pressure of 60 lb. to the square inch was pumped in. The cylinder with its contents was revolved for two hours, then the charge was withdrawn and drained nearly dry by suction, the resultant liquid being slowly filtered through broken charcoal on which the chloride crystals were deposited, in appearance much like the bromo-chlorides of silver ore seen on some of the black manganic oxides of the Barrier silver mines. The charcoal, with its adhering chlorides, was conveyed to the smelting-house and the gold smelted into bars of extremely pure metal. Messrs. Newbery and Vautin claimed for their process decreased time for the operation with increased efficiency."
Mr. Johnson talks about filtering the gold in solution through broken charcoal, depositing the auric chloride crystals there, and then smelting the charcoal with its adhering auric chloride crystals.
Is this a basic form of the carbon adsorption method? Is it really as simple as filtering gold in solution through activated carbon (charcoal)? What becomes of the carbon during smelting, does it all get burnt off?