PreciousMexpert
Well-known member
having one cast in ductile iron would be the best of all worlds.
Is this something I would be able to cast myself with a crucible burning furnace
having one cast in ductile iron would be the best of all worlds.
Very unlikely. There are some serious issues with melting iron in a crucible furnace. The chemistry of the iron is altered due to the burnout of carbon.PreciousMexpert said:having one cast in ductile iron would be the best of all worlds.
Is this something I would be able to cast myself with a crucible burning furnace
What do you do with thisTransfer the recovered mercury to a proper container. To prevent evaporation of mercury while being stored, put a layer of water over the mercury.
I thought you it would need water but it looks like they know what they are sayingWrap the amalgam into small balls with a piece of paper (the foil from a cigarette packet is ideal). This will help prevent the gold from sticking to the distilling chamber under heat.
PreciousMexpert said:I have spent a while studying this concept
http://practicalaction.org/practicalanswers/product_info.php?products_id=281&osCsid=oiba76b9j52211nnuhnickt8q0
I really like it
Question 1
i guess I will be able to make the
# ½ - 1½ inch galvanised iron pipe reducer (2c)
a bit larger
I was never that worried about mercury, although I'm not suggesting that you share that attitude. If you are concerned, store the mercury in a heavy plastic container with water on top. I kept mine in plastic containers with no water. I did use lids.Question 2
What do you do with thisTransfer the recovered mercury to a proper container. To prevent evaporation of mercury while being stored, put a layer of water over the mercury.
Wrap the amalgam into small balls with a piece of paper (the foil from a cigarette packet is ideal). This will help prevent the gold from sticking to the distilling chamber under heat.
They're talking about the gold sticking to the retort, which has nothing to do with water. I used to use a thin piece of asbestos paper to isolate the contents from the bottom of the retort. Mine was made of stainless, which I found to dissolve slightly in mercury. You probably won't have that problem with iron fittings. They will degrade from heat if they are heated very hot, however.I thought you it would need water but it looks like they know what they are saying
¼" black iron pipe
½" diameter stainless
cooling jacket on the condensing pipe.
This one seems like a good way http://www.actionmining.com/Catalog.PDFAir Press (Air Tort)
We developed this years ago for safer handling of mercury amalgam! Made of PVC
which you attach to an air compressor, using only 12 lbs. of pressure. It pushes the
mercury out and leaves the amalgam on the filter. Safer to use than retorting as there
are no mercury vapors. Comes with a 4 micron polypropylene filter and stainless
steel screen. Holds 15 lbs. of mercury.
Cat #AIRPRESS1 Price 35.50
Replacement parts:
Air press end cap parts AIRPRESSEND $ 7.50
4 micron poly filter AIRPRESSFIL 2.50
This also looks good I dont know what the price ishttp://www.abprospecting.com/
The entire retort was built from stainless, so the pipe you see between the condenser and the retort body is ½" stainless tubing. It is one continuous piece, from the retort body to the discharge end. It has no protection because it doesn't need any. Anything between the condenser and the retort body will contain mercury vapors, but they are being transported to the condenser, where the temperature in the tubing drops drastically, so they condense. Once they have cooled and condensed, there is no further need for the water jacket (the large tubing that is over the ½" tubing), because it is expected that there are no vapors remaining. In practice, that proved to be correct. The fabric on the end prevents the retort from sucking water in, although in my experience it didn't work. I found traces of water in my retort when it was opened, but not routinely. By the time water reached the chamber, temperatures were low enough that there were no problems as a result. It's important that no water reach the retort when it's heated, which could result in a steam explosion.goldnugget77 said:In your picture you have a pipe that is in between the condenser and the compartment where the gold goes
What kind of metal is this and it doesn't look like it has any protection
It's important that you keep in mind that I am a (retired) machinist, and that I have machines at my disposal. The condenser was made from large stainless tubing, to which I silver soldered fittings for the water to enter and exit. To seal the tube, end plates were machined from stainless sheet, which were in turn silver soldered to the assembly. By circulating water through the condenser, temperature at the discharge was equal to ambient room temperature.That thick tube the condenser how was that made
That, of course, is the large diameter tubing I just discussed. You don't want any cooling between the condenser and the retort body, otherwise you get condensing prematurely, where some of it will drip back into the retort body. It's very desirable to keep the mercury in a vapor state until it reaches the condenser.Also where is the cooling jacket
Avoid galvanized material, which will form an amalgam with mercury. If you find you must buy galvanized components because you can't locate them in what is commonly termed black iron, you can remove the zinc using lye. HCl will dissolve it in a heart beat, but it also promotes rusting. Lye won't rust the parts.I found this site that sells galvanized products but you said galvanized is not that good
It certainly can be. While I didn't lose any sleep over keeping mercury in containers without a water cover, I still respected the fact that it has the potential to be a killer.Also it seems like everything you do with mercury is hazardous
In my opinion, no, it wouldn't. It's important that you don't form any compounds of mercury, some of which can be extremely unstable. In all cases, they are harmful to you and the environment. Personally, I wouldn't process anything that had mercury included. I practiced what I preached in that regard. After my silver amalgam was retorted, it then received a heating in my fume hood to the point where it was molten. It was then stirred well, to oxidize the tin content. Any residual mercury was driven off.Would it be OK to refine when there is mercury in the batch
For example if there is 4 gram of mercury in 100 ounces of gold
goldnugget77 on September 2nd, 2009, 12:43 pm
Air Press (Air Tort)
We developed this years ago for safer handling of mercury amalgam! Made of PVC
which you attach to an air compressor, using only 12 lbs. of pressure. It pushes the
mercury out and leaves the amalgam on the filter. Safer to use than retorting as there
are no mercury vapors. Comes with a 4 micron polypropylene filter and stainless
steel screen. Holds 15 lbs. of mercury.
Cat #AIRPRESS1 Price 35.50
Replacement parts:
Air press end cap parts AIRPRESSEND $ 7.50
4 micron poly filter AIRPRESSFIL 2.50
This one seems like a good way http://www.actionmining.com/Catalog.PDF
----------------------
http://www.abprospecting.com/
This also looks good I dont know what the price is
---------------------
http://nevada-outback-gems.com/Referenc ... mation.htm
I got this from hereNEVER put the exit end under water in a catch vessel. If you do, a very slight drop in the temperature of the boiling Mercury will create a vacuum sufficient to suck water back through the system right onto the boiling Mercury. This will almost certainly create an explosion, blowing iron shrapnel, poisonous mercury vapors and your gold all over the place. Please believe me when I tell you, that it is a bad idea and extremely dangerous! It may well ruin the rest of your life and probably put you in the hospital (if you are lucky). One thing to note is that as mercury come out of the retort and into the mercury receptacle, the water level will rise as mercury is added to the receptacle. This needs to be noted so that you don't get in trouble with the problem of water being sucked into the retort vessel as described above.
That's pretty much what I was thinking. Note the discharge has a cooling jacket, which I consider to be very important. I would also recommend that you use a small fountain pump to circulate water. The intake should always be the low side, with the discharge being the high side. That way the jacket will always be full of water.goldnugget77 said:Does it look like it could do the job
Just the pleasure of trying to help. I am no longer involved in refining, but I recall all too well how hard it was to learn these things.I hope that you are also getting something good out of this forum.
Yes. Common sense. That includes providing a cooling jacket. To imply that it isn't necessary isn't the smartest thing you've had to say. It's a lot like telling readers that seat belts, in cars, aren't really necessary, either.JOE S (INDY) said:Of course, barring the use of a fume hood (wish that I had one) the only real worry is that of breathing Mercury fumes - and that problem is rather well resolved using strict attention to good ventilation procedures and common sense.