New way to recover gold

Gold Refining Forum

Help Support Gold Refining Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Zolotov

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
62
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3766694/The-simple-method-remove-GOLD-phone-New-technique-recover-300-tonnes-metal-year.html

The method involves placing the circuit boards into mild acid to dissolve all the metal parts.
An oily liquid which contains a chemical compound is then added, which only extracts the gold.

Any idea of what this oily liquid could be?
Or is this some (chemically) useless pageviewmaking content ?
 
The process is called "solvent extraction of gold". It works on solutions that contain gold(III) chloride. DGB or Diethylene glycol butyl. It will absorb the gold chloride when mixed together and then the spent solution will settle out and the gold pregnant DGB will float to the top like oil. It is separated in a separatory funnel and the gold is dropped from the DGB.
 
Geo said:
The process is called "solvent extraction of gold".
Thanks!
BTW, I found another new method, by using mushrooms:

http://gizmodo.com/mushrooms-can-mine-the-gold-from-your-old-cellphones-1563185046

The first step is crushing the old phones into a fine powder. That powder is sieved and passed through the mycelium, which was chemically engineered to attract gold. The researchers say this process recovers 80 percent of the gold, compared to just 10 or 20 percent in the common but toxic chemical processes

maybe someone here tried it?
 
I wouldn't bet on it. While the solvent extraction is actually a refining process, using mushrooms seems a little too much for much too little.
 
Zolotov said:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3766694/The-simple-method-remove-GOLD-phone-New-technique-recover-300-tonnes-metal-year.html

The method involves placing the circuit boards into mild acid to dissolve all the metal parts.
An oily liquid which contains a chemical compound is then added, which only extracts the gold.

Any idea of what this oily liquid could be?
Or is this some (chemically) useless pageviewmaking content ?
Yet another example of a researcher that doesn't know how the recycling business works...
Professor Jason Love, who led the study, told MailOnline: 'Current gold extraction processes use toxic chemicals such as cyanide or mercury which have high toxicity, plus the waste materials remaining after gold recovery often contain toxic metals such as lead.'
Cyanide is used in mining or in special cases on gold plated scrap and is a lot more environmental friendly than "dissolving circuit boards in acid". Mercury is only used in mining in undeveloped countries where people doesn't know better. Mercury is not used in the modern world mining and especially not for recovery of gold in electronic waste.

It can be the reporter that hasn't understood the researcher though.

There are several liquids that can be used today for LLX (Liquid Liquid eXtraction), one of the most known is butyldiglyme, BDG. Another one is Diethyl malonate.
http://goldrefiningwiki.com/mediawiki/index.php/BDG
http://goldrefiningwiki.com/mediawiki/index.php/DEM

http://goldrefiningforum.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=24076&p=254688#p254688

Göran
 
Second article seems like someone have been smoking mushrooms...

How would you practically pass finely crushed cell phones through mycelium? And isn't copper a good fungicide?

I think I'll stick to tested and working methods for my refining.

Googling the source a bit... turns out that the gold has to be in solution, who could have known it was so complicated. :lol:
http://www.vttresearch.com/media/news/filter-developed-by-vtt-helps-recover-80-of-gold-in-mobile-phone-scrap
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892687515000308
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aic.14917/full

It's never as easy as the clickbait article tries to show.

Göran
 
Articles like the first one linked are about as close to fake news as it gets. It is more about writing an article to get sponsors and sell ad space than about refining. All it takes is a little knowledge of refining and a blind eye to all that can go wrong and you can write a pretty good sounding article. Add in a picture of a pile of gold bars and you'll convince all the doubters!

If it wasn't such a sad misrepresentation it could be funny!
 
Zolotov said:
Geo said:
The process is called "solvent extraction of gold".
Thanks!
BTW, I found another new method, by using mushrooms:

http://gizmodo.com/mushrooms-can-mine-the-gold-from-your-old-cellphones-1563185046

The first step is crushing the old phones into a fine powder. That powder is sieved and passed through the mycelium, which was chemically engineered to attract gold. The researchers say this process recovers 80 percent of the gold, compared to just 10 or 20 percent in the common but toxic chemical processes

maybe someone here tried it?
People near Chernobyl use Mushrooms as path lights, since they also attract radioactive elements.
 
Iggy-poo said:
People near Chernobyl use Mushrooms as path lights, since they also attract radioactive elements.
I would call bogus on that statement.

Göran
 
g_axelsson said:
Iggy-poo said:
People near Chernobyl use Mushrooms as path lights, since they also attract radioactive elements.
I would call bogus on that statement.

Göran

I was just trying to be funny. Mushrooms are non-selective, in that they attract other Elements besides Gold, some of which we don't want.

Does that explain the humor better? I know, English is not your first language, but you need to repress the Viking Genes a bit.
 
FrugalRefiner said:
English is my first language, and I didn't understand your humor either.

Dave

Perhaps I should leave another crumb:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20002056
 
Iggy-poo said:
FrugalRefiner said:
English is my first language, and I didn't understand your humor either.

Dave

Perhaps I should leave another crumb:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20002056

Are you really here to learn? Baiting the mods will not earn you any favors and will eventually get you banned.
 
Since the vikings were very scientific minded I have a hard time to see the humor in that post. :wink:

We do get new members now and then that is stupid enough to actually believe in such a story. Sometimes we also get members that use dry humor when discussing serious topics and if a stupid member sees it might try out a dangerous procedure.

Maybe that's why my humor isn't so well developed when I'm on this site.

I actually googled the glowing mushrooms, expecting to find a clickbait site with fake news but what I found was a reference to a computer game that had glowing mushrooms feeding of radiation and was located at Chernobyl. 8)

Several years after that accident we avoided to pick mushrooms since where I live was one of the places hit by the radioactive cloud. Not that hard hit, but the background radiation went up to the same levels as in late 60:es when USA and Soviet stopped the atmospheric nuclear testing.

Göran
 
Actually, there are at least three mushrooms that I know that glow in the dark or luminescence. The Jack-O-Lantern, Pannelus stipticus and sometimes Gymnophilia spectabilis or Big Laughing Gym. However, the glow is not due to radioactivity.
 
Fungi use radiation as a food source:



https://unitedcats.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/major-biological-discoveryinside-the-chernobyl-reactor/


The real reason for not using Mushrooms is that radioactive elements are not a good thing to have in material sent to a Refinery:

http://www.jmrefining.com/files/files/Johnson-Matthey-Standard-Refining-Terms-Conditions-North-America.pdf

Look under deterious materials.
 
I want to know how they "chemically engineer" a mushroom. I've heard of cross breeding plants and splicing DNA, but chemically making a new plant. hmmmm, the BS meter is starting to alarm.
 
rickbb said:
the BS meter is starting to alarm.
Not a BS at all. The first artificial cell was created 7 years ago, that was like "discovering America" event in scientific community:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703559004575256470152341984
Genetic engineering is going to be the next big thing, bigger than software today.

p.s.
they meant "genetically" of course, not chemically, editor's typo
 

Latest posts

Back
Top