This just is not true - In fact - with chemical precipitation there is almost always at least traces of metals left in solution
That is why for YEARS refineries sent their solutions through a cementing process to recover those traces after chemical precipitation - now days they have developed & use resins in place of cementing to recover the trace metals left in solution after chemical precipitation
The entire purpose of "stock pot cementing" is to recover ALL the metals that went into solution because OFTEN times chemical precipitation does not get them all
Kurt
There will always be traces of metal in the solution. Quantitative(!) selective precipitation of palladium is ensured only by dimethylglyoxime. This is due to many properties of palladium. There are scientific studies on palladium and nickel by the Russian chemist Lev Chugaev, who synthesized DMG at the beginning of the 20th century. Another well-known name for DMG is “Chugaev’s reagent”. Perhaps they are not available in English, I don’t know, I've read it in Russian.
Cementation of palladium will not give equal results to chemical precipitation at the same (!) time.
If you have several days for 99,9% precipitation and particles size uniformity does not matter, use cementation.
I can certainly try to explain why complexation works better than ionic-exchange reaction, but I think in the context of the forum this is not important.
All options provide an acceptable metal yield from a practical point of view.
The problem I actually touched on is the inability to obtain palladium powder suitable for catalysis due to parasitic coagulation and alien ions capture during the cementation process.
The powder obtained by cementation will work as a catalyst 10 times worse than that obtained by chemical precipitation.
P. S. And yes, we didn’t talk about the precipitation of all metals. We were talking about pure palladium and obtaining ultra-fine powder from it. Therefore, the remaining theses about ion exchange resins and the precipitation of ALL metals take the discussion in the other direction.
P. P. S Slightly edited the semantics