geedigity said:
The first is due to potentially volatilizing the Au if in the form of AuCl and the second is the AuCl that did not volatilize potentially getting absorbed into the carbon during incineration.
.
There is another way that is good, or better, if you think there is a lot of AuCl in the filters still. Butcher suggests doing a wash with NaOH to convert all the chlorides to oxides or hydroxides. That way the chances of volatizing are less.
I will try to find where he mentioned this, but, I havent had a lot of time to go through the forum again and bookmark the good threads again (more importantly sync my bookmarks after refinding them)
He basically stated to do a good rinse of the filters in some dilute sodium hydroxide, then let it settle, and then decant, afterwords rinsing out the sodium chloride salts (which would also cause volatile losses, if i recall correctly)
The sulfuric leach would pulp some of the filters, and would also convert other metals from their chloride salts to metallic bits.
I usually just slowly dry my stuff, then force dry and then torch them.
After I do the sulfuric conversion, drying silver chloride with a torch is stinky (and dangerous) business.
To say which is better, is probably like comparing oranges to apples. They are both good for their own reasons, and both will help prevent scurvy.
I choose sulfuric solely because I don't like the idea of going blind from one drop of something, yes sulfuric can maim and disfigure me for life (if improperly handled), but Im already blind in one eye, so I dont take chances lightly in that regard.
I also like that there is no intermediate step before conversion to metallic, unlike with NaOH, where it goes to AgO first, then needs more treatments.
Again, all preference
Edit to finish:
I forgot you brought up the carbon absorption.
Im not sure how much of it is an absorption vs being an actual precipitation. Rose mentions carbon being an excellent reducer of gold, in that it will leave a shiny deposit on a chunk of charcoal. Now I know, and realise that there are substantial differences between carbon and activated carbon, and in that aspect, I am unsure if the activated carbon will absorb the gold in its chloride form, or if it will reduce it to metallic gold as well. Im at a birthday party right now, so I am not with my books, but will be home shortly and post a new reply when I find the pertinent information. But, I dont recall activated carbon being mentioned in his book, or many others for that matter.