Keep in mind that you can't compare at-the-smokestack (or tailpipe) numbers to ambient air quality limits. No doubt, it fails the latter something awful, and would certainly kill you if you ran it in an enclosed area.
I asked for a translation, however, because believe it or not, those numbers (without an explanation of the testing conditions) don't contain enough information to make a fair comparison to emissions standards (in the US, at least) without units of volume and time. If you measured that coming out of the tailpipe of a 25MPG car, those numbers (with the exception of the sulfur compounds) would pass EPA Tier 3 emissions with flying colors - And the sulfur compounds would still pass for uses not required to burn ULSD/ULSHO fuels (aviation, some marine, heating oil, offroad use).
Actually, in some states, those numbers wouldn't pass - Because the HC (which without a translation, most likely means unburned "HydroCarbons", not Hydrogen Cyanide) falls below 500ppm. That would disqualify the test as likely falsified, "too good to be true".
I also find it curious that it doesn't contain the numbers really of primary interest to us (since we don't talk about burning a relatively clean hydrocarbon fuel here) - PM10, PM2.5, Lead, Mercury, and Chromium. The last two you wouldn't expect as standard, but the first three, pretty much ubiquitous.
I asked for a translation, however, because believe it or not, those numbers (without an explanation of the testing conditions) don't contain enough information to make a fair comparison to emissions standards (in the US, at least) without units of volume and time. If you measured that coming out of the tailpipe of a 25MPG car, those numbers (with the exception of the sulfur compounds) would pass EPA Tier 3 emissions with flying colors - And the sulfur compounds would still pass for uses not required to burn ULSD/ULSHO fuels (aviation, some marine, heating oil, offroad use).
Actually, in some states, those numbers wouldn't pass - Because the HC (which without a translation, most likely means unburned "HydroCarbons", not Hydrogen Cyanide) falls below 500ppm. That would disqualify the test as likely falsified, "too good to be true".
I also find it curious that it doesn't contain the numbers really of primary interest to us (since we don't talk about burning a relatively clean hydrocarbon fuel here) - PM10, PM2.5, Lead, Mercury, and Chromium. The last two you wouldn't expect as standard, but the first three, pretty much ubiquitous.