Transmutations of Mercury to Gold

[Anonymous]

Interesting read! http://www.levity.com/alchemy/nelson2_7.html

 

[leavemealone]

That is absolutely incredible.Kind of wish I had all of my lamps back now.... lol.Very nice post gus.
Johnny

 

[g_axelsson]

Interesting read but not probable. The amount of gold produced is so minute that it probably came from traces in the Hg. The purity of the Hg and electrodes needed to be in the 8-niner vicinity just to prove the effect and that is really hard to achieve.
If it was so easy to make gold it would be an industrial process right now and it would also have been developed to transmute radioactive waste into more benign isotopes.
Another negative proof is that high pressure Hg lamps are used by the spectroscopic community for high precision spectroscopy. If there was something as Hg transmutating into gold it would affect the measurement and they would need to compensate for it. I've never heard of any such compensation.

Nuclear transmutation by electron capture is really improbable. Known ways to do the transmutation is by :
1. Irradiation of Hg with gamma rays with 6.8 MeV energy. It ejects one neutron creating 197Hg with a half life of 2.5 days decaying into 197Au, stable gold.
2. Spallation, by smashing Hg with high energy protons the resulting debris contains among other things Au, Pt, and Pd.

Read more in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthesis_of_noble_metals

Common to all the methods above is that it is cheaper just to dig the gold out of the earth.

/Göran

 

[newgold]

A few years ago I extracted about 200 grammes of "gold " using a Knelson concentrator from crushed rock .
The concentrate was put into mercury and then retorted . On opening the retort to look for the amalgam there was nothing there . The "gold" had somehow disappeared with the retorted mercury to be collected in a container.
Repeated attempts with nitric acid did not reveal gold, which we later recovered in a crystal form (beautiful tubes) using the chamois squeeze method. Somehow the gold had gone across by taking on the characteristic of mercury and then back into liquid mercury.
Transmutation? ---- maybe-----but only after we started with gold

 

[Ocean]

Philosopher's Stone?

 

[Claudie]

Other peoples dealings with Mercury & Gold
http://www.finishing.com/130/44.shtml

Wikipedia also has an article on synthesis of precious metals
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthesis_of_precious_metals

 

[kuma]

Hello there everyone , hows tricks ? I'm a newbie on the forum so please bear with me ( yeah , like youv'e never heard that one before , ;-) .
Just a thought on the recovery of gold plate from circut pins , gold plated cable sockets and plugs ect.
Since gold can be amalgamated with mercury , is it not possible to dip in , or even mix in then remove your gold plated pieces into said mercury to 'clean off' the gold , then burn off mercury using your torch , leaving behind what I would imagine to be a very tiny amount but nevertheless a very pure piece of gold ?
If this wouldn't work , why not ?
Was just a thought ,
Hope to hear back ,
Kindest regards ,
Chris C. :roll:

 

[goldsilverpro]

kuma,

Since we are in the business of keeping our members healthy and long-lived, evaporating mercury with a torch would be the epitome of stupidity. Also, the material itself would then be contaminated with mercury, especially, I would think, in areas where the mercury contacted copper. There are much safer methods outlined on this forum.

Just because something might work, that doesn't mean it would be sensible to do it.

 

[etack]

this is what happens

http://goldrefiningforum.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=2198&hilit=mercury

there is a whole section on safety
Eric

 

[kuma]

kuma,

Since we are in the business of keeping our members healthy and long-lived, evaporating mercury with a torch would be the epitome of stupidity. Also, the material itself would then be contaminated with mercury, especially, I would think, in areas where the mercury contacted copper. There are much safer methods outlined on this forum.

Just because something might work, that doesn't mean it would be sensible to do it.

Hello , hows tricks ?
Thanks for the reply. I totaly understand the dangers of mercury vapour , and if I were to ever attempt to amalgamate gold with mercury it would as a matter of course be burnt off outside.
This is not somthing that I am even thinking of attempting , I was purly interested in wether or not it was at all possible to recover the gold from these materials in this way !
I am interested in gold and silver recovery and refining using the electrolyisis method , which brought me to your forum through my online 'research' , you can bet I'll most probably pick all your brains on that one at some point !! (if that's o.k. ?)
Thanks again and all the best for now ,
Chris

 

[goldsilverpro]

Inside, outside, you're still contaminating the air and I'm sure the heavy mercury fumes will hang near the ground for awhile. It would be difficult for you or anyone else in the vicinity not to breathe them. A little here, a little there, and then you're very ill.

Buy or make an efficient retort if you're going to deal with mercury. It's the only safe way and all the mercury is collected and is reusable.
http://www.goldrefiningforum.com/phpBB3/search.php?keywords=retort+mercury&terms=all&author=&sv=0&sc=1&sf=all&sk=t&sd=d&sr=posts&st=0&ch=300&t=0&submit=Search

 

[kuma]

Sorry , browser playing up !!

 

[kuma]

That's a fair point and has been taken on board.
As I mentioned before , I have no plans to carry out this procedure , I was merely interested as to whether or not it would work in that way.
I am acutly aware of other 'safer' , and more productive ways of getting things done , and as the father of three amazing kid's , I have no plans to do myself in just yet , and so far I think I'm doing pretty well !
Please don't assume , that just because I have asked about whether or not a procedure is likley to work , that I am going to pop off and try it.
I have watched many fascinating documentaries about nuclear weapons , this doesn't mean that I'm on the look out for plutonium.
It means that I'm interested in the science behind it.
With the greatest of respect and the kindest regards ,
Chris C.

 

[Harold_V]

Please don't assume , that just because I have asked about whether or not a procedure is likely to work , that I am going to pop off and try it.

In this instance, it's important for you to understand that when you propose a hare-brained idea, there's no shortage of idiots that take it to heart, especially when it alludes to a simple way to extract or refine gold. We fight a steady flow of misinformed people on this forum, some of whom have paid good money for misinformation that isn't in their best interest. Armed with that idea, expect to be called out if you post anything moronic. That's what we do here.

I have watched many fascinating documentaries about nuclear weapons , this doesn't mean that I'm on the look out for plutonium.

True, most likely, with you, but do consider what I said, above. Those of us that moderate have a responsibility to ensure that readers aren't fed information that is misleading, especially if it offers risk. And, while we're at it, try to understand that there are those that refuse to come to terms with legitimate information, in particular if it's against that which they prefer to believe. A good example, although not related to refining, is smoking. Those that have no desire to quit often also refuse to acknowledge the connection between smoking and a huge number of health risks, not the least of which is cancer.

It means that I'm interested in the science behind it.

Nothing wrong with learning, but, again, we must be careful to not put in print anything that can be remotely considered as guidance. Anyone looking for the easy way out will generally ignore sound advice and take advantage of concepts that make a task seem easy. A good example of that is the huge number of people that hope to refine gold from e scrap using aqua regia, without addressing the base metals first. We face that problem daily---with some copping an attitude because they read it online.

Do use good judgment when posting. It will keep you in the good graces of the moderators. We run a tight ship here, and the readers tend to be appreciative. It eliminates the need for them to question everything that's posted, so their learning curve is shortened, being fed with a good diet of information.

Harold

 

[texan]

Spend $60.000 to get $1.00 of gold....this has got to have been a government program without a doubt.

Texan

 

[Dirtdiggaler]

I use a air tort to get the values out of the mercury. It has a 1 micron filter in one end of a tube. You just add your mercury then screw on the cap hold it under water and push the mercury through the filter with compressed air. The values are left on the filter. When I do an assay using mercury I dissolve the mercury in a nitric acid and water solution. The gold is then filtered out. To recover the mercury I put a piece of copper wire in the solution and the mercury is precipitated.
The mercury has an affinity for the gold, I do not believe (but I could be wrong) that the mercury would remove the gold from plated components because it is not free gold. I do all my mercury tests under a fume hood and I wear gloves if your skin is acidic or alkaline it will dissolve the mercury into your body and you will be sorry. Never let mercury sit uncovered it off gasses. Never take it into your house if you spill it in your house it will slowly poison you. Mercury is safe if used correctly but deadly if you repeatedly use it wrong it slowly kills you.

 

[NoIdea]

The only thing you will achieve by mixing mercury with gold plated “what evers” is mercury covered gold plated “what evers”. Kind of like tinning gold with mercury.

Many years ago, bin there done that, still have them in a sealed quick fit bottle. One day I will set up a wee still to deal with it.

If you are using mercury, please keep some sulphur powder around in case of spills.

Deano

 

[Harold_V]

The mercury has an affinity for the gold, I do not believe (but I could be wrong) that the mercury would remove the gold from plated components because it is not free gold.

Mercury, like most liquid metals, is a solvent of other metals. Gold is dissolved in mercury, until the mercury gets saturated. Whether you could recover gold by that process may or may not work, but it's important to understand that gold that has been exposed to mercury is not unchanged.

Solder used in wave soldering machines slowly gets contaminated with gold, yet the solder is well below the melting point of gold. Again, a case where a liquid dissolves a solid.

Harold

 

[Dirtdiggaler]

The mercury has an affinity for the gold, I do not believe (but I could be wrong) that the mercury would remove the gold from plated components because it is not free gold.

Mercury, like most liquid metals, is a solvent of other metals. Gold is dissolved in mercury, until the mercury gets saturated. Whether you could recover gold by that process may or may not work, but it's important to understand that gold that has been exposed to mercury is not unchanged.


Solder used in wave soldering machines slowly gets contaminated with gold, yet the solder is well below the melting point of gold. Again, a case where a liquid dissolves a solid.

Harold

This is what I have read and been taught. Solvent extraction is when you transfer certain ionic species in an aqueous solution to an organic solvent and I did not know that "liquid metals are a solvent of other metals" very interesting.
(Gold and silver are not soluble in mercury, as stated in most texts. The gold and silver simply combine with mercury to form a pasty mixture. It is like the relationship of diamonds and grease: Diamonds have an affinity for grease and are collected on greased plates C.W Ammen). As you stated, the gold is unchanged. Does that mean The amalgam is a mixture - not a compound.



Could it be that lead is very corrosive when its molten so the gold becomes soluble in the lead as it does in a fire assay? When I am testing an ore and I see visible metal in my scope, I pan until all I have left is the metal, then I add the metal to 30 grams of lead and cupel at 1700 degrees. Gold and platinum have a higher melting point and for some reason they are soluble in molten lead. The part that baffles me is that you can have an assay bead with ruthenium, osmium, and rhodium when they are not very soluble in molten lead.
Thank you for your reply Harold I have learned so much from this forum.

 

[Harold_V]

This is what I have read and been taught. Solvent extraction is when you transfer certain ionic species in an aqueous solution to an organic solvent and I did not know that "liquid metals are a solvent of other metals" very interesting.
(Gold and silver are not soluble in mercury, as stated in most texts. The gold and silver simply combine with mercury to form a pasty mixture.

I'm inclined to disagree with that. If it was true that mercury did not dissolve gold and silver, dental amalgam wouldn't work as it does. It is also well known that covering a gold ring with mercury destroys the ring. It may be that it dissolves one of the alloying agents, however, which might also explain why dental amalgam works as it does. It contains some copper, along with silver.

It is like the relationship of diamonds and grease: Diamonds have an affinity for grease and are collected on greased plates C.W Ammen). As you stated, the gold is unchanged. Does that mean The amalgam is a mixture - not a compound.

I think you may have misunderstood what I said. I'm of the opinion that the gold is changed when in contact with mercury, evidenced by the destruction of alloyed gold jewelry. Again, that may be due to the removal of copper, although I don't know that it is.

I'm not convinced I'd say molten lead was corrosive---it's just a solvent. I suppose that's a matter of acceptable terms, for dissolving something you wish to remain un-dissolved would certainly be viewed as having corroded. At any rate, molten metals are good solvents of other metals, otherwise litharge wouldn't be nearly as useful as it is in an assay.

Harold