Dirtdiggaler
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Messages
- 38
Harold_V said:I'm inclined to disagree with that. If it was true that mercury did not dissolve gold and silver, dental amalgam wouldn't work as it does. It is also well known that covering a gold ring with mercury destroys the ring. It may be that it dissolves one of the alloying agents, however, which might also explain why dental amalgam works as it does. It contains some copper, along with silver.dirtdiggaler said:This is what I have read and been taught. Solvent extraction is when you transfer certain ionic species in an aqueous solution to an organic solvent and I did not know that "liquid metals are a solvent of other metals" very interesting.
(Gold and silver are not soluble in mercury, as stated in most texts. The gold and silver simply combine with mercury to form a pasty mixture.
I think you may have misunderstood what I said. I'm of the opinion that the gold is changed when in contact with mercury, evidenced by the destruction of alloyed gold jewelry. Again, that may be due to the removal of copper, although I don't know that it is.It is like the relationship of diamonds and grease: Diamonds have an affinity for grease and are collected on greased plates C.W Ammen). As you stated, the gold is unchanged. Does that mean The amalgam is a mixture - not a compound.
I'm not convinced I'd say molten lead was corrosive---it's just a solvent. I suppose that's a matter of acceptable terms, for dissolving something you wish to remain un-dissolved would certainly be viewed as having corroded. At any rate, molten metals are good solvents of other metals, otherwise litharge wouldn't be nearly as useful as it is in an assay.
Harold
I would like to learn more about metals being solvents of other metals, it is very interesting do you know any literature on the subject ?