Smack said:
Let us know asap how it does on the coins.
The salesman for the Niton XL2 was a genuinely nice guy, not one of those pushy "guerrilla" type salesman, an engineer by trade and a sales rep for Thermo Scientific. He spent three hours with me in my office this morning and we really put the XL2 through its paces.
A few notes:
The State of Illinois requires the unit to be registered with the State. "IEMA" (Illinois Emergency Management Agency) charges $110.00 per year for the registration and an on site visit- mostly to see the environment where the unit is being used and make sure the user understands the unit and general xray safety. (Such as, never point on your skin and pull the trigger- sheesh) Hey, everyone needs a job, I guess.
The XL2 unit is factory calibrated and it is impossible to alter or adjust the calibration. (You
cannot program it to say 14k gold is 12k gold, etc.) There is a test feature on the touch screen home page that allows you to test the calibration against a sample contained within the unit. If adjustments are necessary, it is done automatically.
X-Rays are dispersed in a (maximum) 10' x 6" cone. When the unit is in the test stand (included) there is no dispersion.
Regarding wear and loss of performance: The xray tube works or it doesn't work. The unit has a gold anode that does wear over time. If one were to scan 20-30 items per day, no rebuild is required and no loss of efficiency would be noticed within 10 years. If one were scanning 2000-3000 items per day, you could expect to rebuild the unit twice within the 10 year time span at $6,800.00 per rebuild in today's dollars. (You'd probably buy a new unit before 10 years.)
The unit tests for 14 elements: Au, Ag, Pt, Pd, Rh, Ru, Ir, Zn, Cu, Ni, Co, Fe, Se, Pb
The length of time you hold the trigger determines the quality of the readings. 2-3 seconds is normal for a piece of known quality. 5 seconds is ideal for most pm's of karat gold jewelry when testing to purchase it. We tested pieces up to 2 minutes of trigger hold. As you hold the trigger, results become more refined and gradually reach a point where the figures hardly change at all, indicating maximum read.
We tested many more different types of pieces than what is listed below. We took 66 total readings and used less than 20% of the battery over 3 hours of on time. The battery is rated for about 5 hours of continuous on time under constant testing. It isn't the taking of readings that drains the battery as much as the cooling mechanism, screen and other electronics continuous consuming power. The battery takes about 4 hours to recharge. Spare batteries are $175.00 and no car charger is available.
The way to tell if a piece is heavily plated or gold filled is by taking multiple readings at different spots including edges, looking for more than one third to one half karat difference in the pm readings.
Besides looking at the readouts on the unit's screen, you can switch to review a graph of the different elements present. There are peaks and valleys on the graph that can give better indications than the percentage readouts. (When you learn how to properly read the graph)
Another good thing is that the software for the PC is very good. (Windows based- no software for an iPad) You can operate the unit from your PC while the unit is in the stand; holding the trigger on as long as you want. Click start to start, click stop to stop testing. It includes graphs, Excel spreadsheets and great reporting features including a "Certificate of Evaluation" if you choose to print one. (Notice it isn't a "certified assay" report)
Test Results:
1st up: 2009 US Mint .9999 one troy ounce high relief gold liberty coin
90 second trigger hold:
Au 99.97% +/- 0.15%
no other elements detected.
Pretty darn right on the money.... tested several times in different spots at different trigger hold times, same results.
2nd up: 1 troy ounce "brand name" fine silver bar .999
45 second trigger hold:
Ag 99.99% +/- .09%
no other elements detected
5 second trigger hold:
Ag 99.99% +/- .28%
no other elements detected
I'd say even .28 of a percent variance is pretty accurate.....
Next up: Two tone Rolex watch band "18k and Stainless Steel"
10 second trigger hold:
Tested as "17.76k"
Au 74.01% +/- .42
Ag 12.58% +/- .25%
Zn .1666% +/- .093%
Cu (darn... I forgot to write this one down!)
User-caused problems could arrive measuring this watch band if the unit was picking up parts of the stainless steel adjacent to the gold... be careful how you aim!
Next up: 1930's Colt Police Issue blued .38 caliber revolver (Salesman's sample XL2 unit has all programs loaded on it to test all possible elements for various users and we switched the software to test the pistol. Normally, the XL2 doesn't come with the ability to indicate Mn or Lec's)
5 second trigger hold:
Fe 97.97% +/- .35%
Mn .755% +/- .126%
Lec .910% +/- .011%
Cu .154% +/- .070%
Next Up: 1888-O Morgan silver dollar- uncirculated condition
18 second trigger hold:
Ag 93.48% +/- .23%
Ir .069% +/- .036
Zn .055% +/- .032
Cu 6.19% +/- .09%
90 second trigger hold:
Ag 93.75% +/- .11%
Ir .059% +/- .016%
Cu 6.19% +/- .09%
See how the readings can become a little more accurate as the trigger is held longer? (reading taken at the same position on the coin each time) And yes, coin silver can be more pure than .900.
Another note: Usually, If the variance (2nd number above) isn't at least 1/3 of the percentage number of the element (1st number) then it most likely isn't in the piece being tested.... The first test result indicated trace Zn... In the sample above, the second number (variance) is better than 1/2 the percentage
but the trace amount was so small it was eliminated in the second, longer trigger hold reading.
Next up: 1884 Mexican gold 1 Peso coin
25 second trigger hold:
Tested as 21k
Au 87.65% +/- .29%
Ag .369% +/- .033%
Pt .461% +/- .242%
Zn .218% +/- .068%
Cu 11.20% +/- .17%
Next Up: Men's yellow gold bracelet- hallmarked 14k
10 second trigger hold
Au 58.3% +/- .46%
Ag 8.78% +/- .22%
Zn 8.3% +/- .22%
Cu 24.62% +/- .35%
Last up: Copper pipe fitting
10 second trigger hold:
Cu 99.93% +/- .48%
Other notes:
The salesman plainly stated that this unit isn't a total replacement for experience, eyeballs, other testing means and proper assay. Although, he did like my idea to pour very thin pieces of refined pm's and test both sides in multiple spots... It is a pretty accurate tool in my book. All in all, I think the unit is efficient and accurate and very well constructed and worth the investment.
I tried really hard to poke holes and be skeptical, as I usually am, but couldn't find much of anything not to like.
Price out the door: $16,800.00.
edited once for human speeling errors. hehe