Refining of Gold from Mines

shop deals on amazon
Shop deals on ebay
xelexo
Advertise with us
Gold Refining Forum

Help Support Gold Refining Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
that's part of their problem. Heat is really required to drive the reaction without excessive amounts of aqua regia.


Mole for mole, sulfur dioxide is probably much cheaper at NOx removal, but it is less effective and the gold precipitate loses quality towards the end.
 
Well QVF does sell a strap on soft mantle for the bottom of that vessel. Maybe they can trade in some of the taller vessels they are using for holding spent solution for a mantle.

Without going back and reading everything, said I do believe they said there is no additional heat. I have used Italimpianti tumbler plants without heat successfully but a blade stirrer is not the same as tumbling the shot. Tumblers actually allow for higher silver content in the feed due to the abrasion of the tumble.

The use of chemistry to kill off excess nitric is higher in the tumbler plants than in the closed reaction vessels like the QVF that have heat to drive the reaction.
 
@ 4Metal
The calculation for the sulfamic acid addition gives a clear idea thank you so much for that. I have noted it down. And what you said about employees well yes we just got a slight taste of it. And definitely learnt - Less Nitric Always.

Now the Sulphur Dioxide (No we have not given up either :) ) - In order to use sulphur dioxide gas we cannot use it right away here in the place where we are located. We need to inform The Pollution Control Board Department of our State that we will be using sulphur dioxide gas and they have to come and inspect our premises for this, to make sure that all the safety measures have been taken and that the entire process would be carried out properly provided that the neutralization of the fumes is done well before it is let out in open air. We have already informed the department. Once we get the green signal we will use this method.

@ Lou

Yes we did learn that patience is always important and in this particular process, to carry it out properly, less nitric is one of the keys.
As for the chemist no he has not worked at Kaloti, it was another refinery.
 
I'm not a chemist by any means and don't understand all the chemistry involved, but i do think more water is your friend with smb.

Pull a 1 lt sample and dilute it by half after filtering and see if that helps. It won't take but a min to see! I'm a firm believer in water and smb. I used to have problems with my solutions wanting to redissolve when i added smb even though the nitric was neutralized. It was like when the nitrate ion left the gold for precipitation it would act with the smb to redissolve the gold because it didn't have a place to go. Not sure in chemistry terms how that would work, but i figured it was because their wasn't enough water to buffer the reaction. With more water i've learned i have less problems.
 
Something that might you might want to consider adding to your process is a heating mantel for your reaction vessel to be used during your primary reaction. A warm or hot solution will utilize your nitric more and allow you to get closer to completely using all of the nitric in your solution. This would also aid in having a warm solution when adding the sulfamic acid to denox the solution.

I am not sure if this would help him or not in his process but I have been guilty at times of adding 32% hydrogen peroxide to my reaction vessel to give the nitric acid some added oxygen for the process and allow a more complete use of the nitric acid that is added. This should be commented on by Lou and the others before it is added because it might cause some problem that I am not aware of.

Another train of thought is that after he has added the sulfanic acid and the endothermic reaction has dropped the temperature of the solution. Not being sure of how much ice he is using at this point in his process to cool the solution to help remove the silver chloride from the solution, I will generally add enough ice to bring the temperature down in the solution to where the outside of the reaction vessel starts condensing the water vapor from the surrounding ambient air and sometimes even creates frost on the side of the vessel.

Another trick to consider that I use is I add crushed ice to my filtering vessel to keep the solution cold during filtering and I have found that I have better success at removing the silver chloride from the solution when doing this. I have found that sometimes but not always this will also trap the silver chloride in the ice and not allow it to clog the filter during the filtering process, but he has not stated he has a problem with this aspect of the procedure.

Another note to be added here is after that filtering is if he uses ice in the filtering vessel is that it gives him a super cooled solution in his precipitation vessel. This is an aid in one part in that when he adds his sodium metabisulphate to the solution is that it will allow more of the SO2 gas to stay in the cold solution to precipitate the gold, and prevent some gassing off of the SO2 gas out of the solution during the exothermic reaction that takes place from the precipitation of the gold out of solution. There is a drawback to doing this with a cold solution as well, if he reads enough on the forum he will find that ice is recomended by some in the precipitation vessel to counter react the exothermic reaction during the precipitation of the gold to allow better usage of the SO2 gas created, if he gets over confident in doing this he can set up a scenario where he adds a lot of sodium metabisulphite solution to the vessel and as the temperature raises quickly that the SO2 gas can try to gas off and cause a boil over reaction in the precipitation vessel.

Another point that needs to be addressed is that if he uses a large excess of sodium metabisuphate in the solution is that as the gold drops out of the solution it will trap SO2 bubbles in the powder and as the solution warms up these bubbles will try to escape the powder and bring some of the gold up into the solution with them. I will generaly boiled my gold powder in water a couple of times to remove any excess SO2 gas.

Another point to make is that during the denoxing of the gold chloride is that if he has not denoxed all of the excess nitric out of the solution he will have some minor carry over of nitric to his precipitation vessel and after he removes his precipitated gold from the vessel and then tries to wash it with hot HCL that he will have some of the gold go back into his washing solution. One way to counter react this is after the boils in water as mentioned in the paragraph above is to make sure the gold is in fine particals after the water boils and instead of going to an HCL wash is to go to an ammonia wash a couple of times to remove any traces of silver chloride and copper that might have gotten through the procedure.

Another tool he might want to consider putting in his arsenal is an infrared temperature reader to keep up with judging the temperatures of his reactions since glass is a good thermal conductor of temperature.
 
Frank, if the gold is gone out of the solution with sulfur dioxide and no more red NOx is fumed off, the nitrates are gone.

One can safely wash the gold precipitate with muriatic if one has a quantitative precipitation and negative stannous.

Should mention that after stirring and the first negative stannous, give it some time to settle and when it's settled, then check again with stannous just to be sure.


Lou
 
Lou said:
Frank, if the gold is gone out of the solution with sulfur dioxide and no more red NOx is fumed off, the nitrates are gone.

One can safely wash the gold precipitate with muriatic if one has a quantitative precipitation and negative stannous.

Should mention that after stirring and the first negative stannous, give it some time to settle and when it's settled, then check again with stannous just to be sure.


Lou
Click to expand...

Yes I agree. About the only time I have had the gold go back into the solution is when I have left the gold powder on the hot plate in HCL over night. So I have learned not to leave it on the hot plate over night. 8)
 
We did the process again properly this time. I am sending the pictures of the left over solution after the precipitation.

Now we took a bit of the solution in a beaker and tested it with a little stannous chloride and this is what it looks like. There is some left over gold in the solution. Now how should we go about this? Should we be adding more SMB?

The drying of the fine gold powder, the melting and the assaying is still pending though so we yet do not know the exact amount pending.

And we have understood the need of a heating device for the mixing reactor. Will get it done as well so that next time we work with Sulfamic Acid we get the proper result.
 

Attachments

  • after filtration.jpg
    after filtration.jpg
    70.4 KB · Views: 285
  • IMG_20150429_015044.jpg
    IMG_20150429_015044.jpg
    513.1 KB · Views: 285
You should test before you filter the gold powder to make sure the drop is complete. That way you don't have to filter and drop it twice. You should test with stannous using a spot plate or a piece of paper. If it still test positive add more smb until you get a negative reaction with stannous.
 
Every time i see you add sncl to liquid i cringe!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGBrsfn0ouM[/youtube]
 
Ralph is right. Putting stannous chloride into your acid forms the colloid we spoke of earlier. It is so fine that in low concentrations it is difficult to even see. Using a spot plate, paper towel, or Q Tip wet with a few drops of solution and applying a single drop of stannous chloride test solution will detect less gold in solution. I prefer paper towels because they go with the burnable recoverable materials and you get your gold back down the line.

Please remember that stannous chloride goes bad. Faster if you do not add tin metal to the solution. Always keep a small volume of solution you know contains gold to test the solution when you get a negative test. It is an easy way to screw up and lose gold. Take a few milliliters (maybe 2) of gold dissolved in your reactor with the next lot and add about 20 ml of water and keep it in a vial so you have a sample to compare to.

Your acid after the drop is as clean as the Hydrochloric often is before we start refining! If this mining doré is the type of material you set up to refine, why did you buy a filter press? At the concentration of metals in the waste you have shown us, it will take thousands of treated gallons to fill the press with hydroxides. What other gold or silver material do you process?
 
Silver Silver Silver !!! Your right 4metals with that waste stream after recovery of the silver he could use an evaporator in his waste process to concentrate the solutions. He could run a long time between waste treatments with a lot less trouble!
 
ashapura refinery said:
As for the recovery we have done so far:
1) We had used cpvc pipes earlier and we found fine gold particles in the pipes, we then removed these pipes and cleaned them out.
Click to expand...

Where where these pipes located? Was it between precipitating vessels and settling vessels or after the settling vessels and before waste disposal?
 
ashapura refinery said:
We did the process again properly this time. I am sending the pictures of the left over solution after the precipitation.

Now we took a bit of the solution in a beaker and tested it with a little stannous chloride and this is what it looks like. There is some left over gold in the solution. Now how should we go about this? Should we be adding more SMB?
Click to expand...
That could be a false positive due to an excess of SMB. Correct me if I'm wrong as I've only worked with smaller lots, but the pale liquid after the drop and the brown color of the colloid after adding stannous to the liquid looks like a complete drop to me. Stannous reacts with a brown color on excess SO2 or SMB.

And I agree with the others, your 100 ml test sample for stannous is as big as my larger lots. You only need drops of the liquid to do a test with stannous.

It will be nice to see the final yield of this lot, both in purity and quantity. I'm eagerly awaiting the results.

Göran
 
Ralph,

Waste treatment from acid refining never benefits much from atmospheric evaporators. The most concentrated you can get the acid is down to its azeotrope concentration so there is still a lot of volume you will not evaporate easily.

The other option is break the acid with caustic. In this case there is a lot of chloride in the waste and caustic adds a lot of sodium so the salt concentration is very high. The salt will clog the evaporator quickly.

As much as Shawn from Chem Tec would love to sell you an evaporator, they are made for electroplaters rinse waters where the majority of the waste is water. Chem Tec also makes a line of scrubbers, hoods and vacuum equipment specifically for refining http://www.goldrefiningequipment.com/Index.html
 
ashapura refinery said:
This time we told our chemist that we are not going to use the Soda Ash procedure and will be using Sulfamic Acid and then precipitate by using only SMB. Apparently he was not very happy with this idea. Later in the evening he gave up saying I cannot do this process anymore and left.
Click to expand...

ashapura

If your chemist was unable to understand &/or follow the instructions being passed on to you by Lou & 4metals you are better off with out him --- He was clearly taught wrong methods when it comes to refining ( I could not believe what I was reading when I first read the methods you were using they were so wrong) & does not want to except that his methods are wrong & therefore is not open to learning what is right & what works

You are currently being advised by 2 of the very best in the world when it comes to large volume refining of PMs - about the only thing I can think of that would be better then getting this advise from them here on the forum - would be to actually "hire" 4metals to come over & do an actual on sight walk through of your operation (if he is willing to do so as that is what he does/did but I believe he is now retired &/or semi retired)

A heating mantle on your reaction vessel would be a good thing as that will help to drive the reaction of the acids to completion especially as the reaction nears the end which means you will use less nitric which in turn means less free nitric to de-nox

I have been following this thread with much interest & you are being "very well advised" by those commenting on your problems & if you follow what is being said you should start seeing much better results

Kurt
 
kurtak said:
ashapura refinery said:
This time we told our chemist that we are not going to use the Soda Ash procedure and will be using Sulfamic Acid and then precipitate by using only SMB. Apparently he was not very happy with this idea. Later in the evening he gave up saying I cannot do this process anymore and left.
Click to expand...

ashapura

If your chemist was unable to understand &/or follow the instructions being passed on to you by Lou & 4metals you are better off with out him --- He was clearly taught wrong methods when it comes to refining ( I could not believe what I was reading when I first read the methods you were using they were so wrong) & does not want to except that his methods are wrong & therefore is not open to learning what is right & what works

You are currently being advised by 2 of the very best in the world when it comes to large volume refining of PMs - about the only thing I can think of that would be better then getting this advise from them here on the forum - would be to actually "hire" 4metals to come over & do an actual on sight walk through of your operation (if he is willing to do so as that is what he does/did but I believe he is now retired &/or semi retired)

A heating mantle on your reaction vessel would be a good thing as that will help to drive the reaction of the acids to completion especially as the reaction nears the end which means you will use less nitric which in turn means less free nitric to de-nox

I have been following this thread with much interest & you are being "very well advised" by those commenting on your problems & if you follow what is being said you should start seeing much better results

Kurt
Click to expand...
I agree ,You may just find you precious metal leak has just walk out your door.
Big alarm bell's when an employe throws his toy's out of the pram for you improving your system.
Make a good offer to a refiner with a good reputation who you like and get on.
I can not take any one who suggests you try to run a lab with out heating vessel's seriously.
Just
 
I agree with Kurt.

You'd be well advised to engage Lou or 4metals professionally, they really do understand what this is about and their fees would likely be recouped in short order. As others have mentioned I think you may have the wrong team around you and that is a road to nowhere. As a point of reference for you I also run a company which is over 18 years old and employ many people so I do understand business, and from my perspective you need to stop the problems right now or you could lose a lot of money and possibly all the investment.

Good luck, and take the good advice that has previously been given.

Jon
 

Latest posts

Back
Top