Film silver recover,a new process

Gold Refining Forum

Help Support Gold Refining Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Juan Manuel Arcos Frank

Well-known member
Joined
May 27, 2008
Messages
708
Location
Pachuca,Hidalgo.México
There are many processes for silver recovery from B/W films,offset negatives and radiographies.Combustion of film,nitric acid leaching,caustic soda leaching and CLOROX treatment have been proposed in this forum.Except combustion,all of them produce a silver intermediate compound that needs more processing to obtain pure silver,besides,all these processes release toxic fumes to the environment and nitric acid leaching and caustic soda leaching can cause severe burns.

The new process uses a low concentration of oxalic acid to attack the gelatine of the film and the silver goes down as a grey/black mud that only needs drying and melting to obtain pure silver.Concentrated oxalic acid is poisonous,please,use NIOSH/MSHA approved respirator,NIOSH approved gloves,splash goggles for eye protection and wear appropriate clothing to prevent skin exposure. Read MSDS for oxalic acid before start the process.

The process is quite simple,just make a 5%(weight or volumen) solution of oxalic acid in tap water,heat this solution to 95 C,then submerge the films in the acid solution,in 20 minutes all the silver is removed.Once that all silver has been removed rinse the films and let them dry,you can sell the plastic base to a plastic scrap dealer.

Let the mud settle down,pour off the liquid solution,dry the mud and melt it,you will get 0.999 silver.

Manuel
 
I'm always interested in a new way of processing film.

Several questions.

(1) Does silver oxalate form or, does all of the silver remain as silver metal? If silver oxalate does form, it is on every explosive compound list that I can find. I found one MSDS for a rust remover that was pure oxalic acid. It said that it would form silver oxalate on contact with silver. Silver oxalate doesn't seem to be extremely explosive, but it can be when confined or heated.

(2) How does oxalic acid react with silver bromide (on green film)? How does it react with silver bismuthate, which I think is the chemical found on the very common Dryview x-ray film? In the U.S., almost all lots of rare earth x-ray film contains some Dryview mixed with it. Will oxalic acid clean all the emulsion and silver off of Dryview film?

(3) 95C (203 F) is very hot. What type of vessel do you heat it in?

(4) What happens to the emulsion. Is it all converted to soluble amino acids by the oxalic (very doubtful) or, is it (even partially) included in the silver sludge? If it is included in the silver sludge, I cannot see how it could be practically be direct melted (after drying) without first incinerating it.

(5) Does it completely remove the transparent mylar coating from the PET x-ray film? If not, the scrap value of the plastic is near zero. Also, if there are any black specks of silver from Dryview film mixed with the plastic, the plastic is worthless.

(6) What is the chemical cost to process a pound of x-ray film with oxalic acid? I would bet it's a lot more than caustic soda.

(7) Have you ever done this on anything greater than a lab scale? I consider 1000 pounds per day as still small scale. To make money, film refining is a high volume, low margin process. It requires lots of space, equipment, and labor. Can oxalic acid compete with caustic soda at a 50,000 pound per day level?

Except combustion,all of them produce a silver intermediate compound that needs more processing to obtain pure silver,besides,all these processes release toxic fumes to the environment and nitric acid leaching and caustic soda leaching can cause severe burns.

Not true!

After stripping, neither caustic soda or enzymes/baking soda require more processing, except for incineration/melting. I believe the oxalic acid product will require the same.

Neither caustic soda or enzymes release toxic fumes.

At 200 F (the same as the oxalic process), only 3 to 4%. w/v, caustic soda is needed. I doubt that this strength is any more dangerous than 200 F oxalic acid - probably less. Oxalic acid is a strong organic acid. Are you saying that a 203 F solution of it won't cause burns?

I liked your battery info very much, but I don't like the oxalic process at all. I think it's a curiosity rather than a good production method. For an amateur to play with, it may be OK (if it doesn't form silver oxalate). As a serious production method, it seems to miss the mark, no matter what.

I look forward to your response on these points.

Please don't take this personally. You're one of the best people on the forum, as far as knowledge and imagination go, and I'm sure you have other things up your sleeve. I'm a pessimist when it comes to processes. There are so, so many ways to skin a cat in this business. I always look at things from the "what's wrong with them" viewpoint. I've been surprised too many times in the last 40 years.

I learned to never live or die with a process, even if I were the one to invent it (very difficult to displace the ego). Going from lab quantities to production quantities is often very difficult and full of surprises. I would rather examine things negatively at the very beginning.
 
GSP:

Oh My God!..a chance to discuss with you, a giant of this forum,well,let us do it but first of all I recognize the fact that you know more about silver recovery than I.

(1)
In low concentration oxalic acid does not dissolve the silver,silver always remains as silver metal.You are right about rust remover,but it is pure oxalic acid,using concentrated oxalic acid you could form silver oxalate,extremely explosive.

(2)
Oxalic acid attacks gelatine,not black silver in the film,the acid does not attack silver halide either,so if you have virgin films the silver halide will precipitate but I strongly suggest you to select developed films from virgin films,virgin films can be submerged in a common photo fixer and it is lovely recovering silver from these type of films.About silver bismuthate I know nothing about it.

(3)
Yes.Sir,95 C (203 F) is very hot but since I come from photofinishing bussines I use 316 stainless steel vessels from my obsolete machinery to heat the solution,to get 95 C I use a common direct fire device.

(4)
Gelatine is a protein,so the oxalic acid dissolves it by breaking down the cross link network of the gelatine,the gelatine gets flaky and covers the silver which comes down.The acid also dissolves aminoacids,fire´s torch will complete the job to get pure silver.

(5)
Yes,it does completely remove all components from the layer,you can get a clear film (X ray,offset negative or B/W negative).Many years ago,the clean film of a radiography values more than its silver content.Plastic scrap dealers will be happy when you sell to them the clean plastic films.

(6)
GSP,do not bet,you will lose because if you compare both processes oxalic process is cheaper than NaOH process just for a simple fact: NaOH process forms a black colloidal solution of silver which is impossible to filtrate and never will precipitate so you have got to break down the colloidal solution by heating,stirring and settling down for a couple of hours.Oxalic process just needs 20 minutes and pure silver is easy to precipitate.Here in Mexico NaOH costs 11 pesos a kilogram (almost 1 USD),oxalic acid costs 20 pesos a kilogram (almost 2 USD).

(7)
This new process will fit any load of films,I used to recovery silver with NaOH but I have changed to oxalic process because is cheaper and faster.This process can compete,and defeat,the other processes.


You are right about caustic soda/enzime processes,they do not release toxic fumes.

Of course,at 95 C anybody could burn but I mean chemical burns with nitric acid or NaOH.


GSP,here is a new and revolutionary process,let us meet the challenge,why do not you try it?,anyway if you do not like oxalic process you can still using NaOH process,but I am sure you will change to the oxalic process like a I have changed to oxalic process a few years ago.

Regards

Manuel
 
I am watching this intently. Oxalic acid is indeed more expensive than lye but I would far, far rather use hot oxalic acid--it is far more benign in my opinion. Also, oxalic acid is easy obtained from Univar or Brenntag by the 22kg sack.


From the chemist's standpoint--silver oxalate is something I would not bet on given the temperature of this reaction as it would thermodynamically unfavorable. Most explosives are made at low temperatures. Also, silver oxalate isn't terribly soluble, and as I recall it, it's made from soluble silver cation, not from solid silver which even colloidally dispersed ought to be inert to attack by oxalic acid of any concentration. What ought to happen isn't really good enough in my opinion when it comes to explosives. This process has me interested and I will probably conduct my own experiment in the laboratory with this.

Of late, I am very, very wrapped up with the platinum group but I will concede that there is lots of silver out there in this world and there exists a tremendous profit potential for recovering silver versus other precious metals. It may be cheap as dirt in comparison to rhodium, but I will see thousands of ounces of silver for every ounce of rhodium.

I have revised my view on silver in the past few months, mainly due to my readings of Chris's work with it. I've never dabbled in chasing silver save for using it in other processes but I've friends that are doctors and/or professors that see and have thousands of pounds of x-ray film that they must pay to dispose of so I'm thinking to give it a go. I'm quite interested in how you both establish your supply of film and other silver materials--if I do this I would like to set it up to do it on a large scale.

If you have a mind to, either of you contact me privately with your professional opinions on it. I'm willing to do quid pro quo on my ideas and practices regarding the platinum group.


Louis
 
there exists a tremendous profit potential for recovering silver versus other precious metals

I don't understand why... Is it because the volume evolved is much larger than other precious metals ?

I've been interested in silver recovery/refining lately as well, I'm currently making photo grade silver nitrate.

Thanks for any inputs.
 
Exactly my point. I think across the board, it is much more easy to acquire huge quantities of silver at a good profit margin than gold or other PMs. It makes sense since there is more silver floating around as it is more common, and cheaper (therefore it's properties are fully exploited).

That said, if you can make a dollar or two per ounce on silver and do several thousand ounces a day, you're doing (in my opinion mind you) quite well.
 
I considered silver refining nothing short of a nuisance (although interesting), but it's very much a part of refining gold-----it almost always comes with scrap karat gold, and becomes the carrier of platinum and palladium, so you don't really have any options. You must process silver, or lose some values to others.

In a sense, I processed silver for my customers in exchange for their gold business. On rare occasion, I processed just silver, often from dental amalgam. It's a great source if you can get hooked up with a few dentists.

Harold
 
First of all, let me apologize for, perhaps, making a judgment too early. I presently have no lab to test this process. So, let's assume that I was too hasty and let's start from scratch.

I recognize the fact that you know more about silver recovery than I.
Don't sell yourself short. You know a lot more about using oxalic acid than I do.

(1) Even the very slightest possibility of forming silver oxalate would prevent me from using this process, especially since the caustic process works so well. I would have to absolutely know that the conditions would be such that it would be impossible to form silver oxalate. I find it difficult to think in anything but large quantities. Melting would be done in about 4000 oz quantities. If any silver oxalate were initially present, the results could be disastrous. Here's a guy that has played with this: It's not very good, but it's a start.
http://www.powerlabs.org/chemlabs/silver_oxalate.htm

Concentrated oxalic acid is poisonous,please,use NIOSH/MSHA approved respirator,NIOSH approved gloves,splash goggles for eye protection and wear appropriate clothing to prevent skin exposure. Read MSDS for oxalic acid before start the process.
(2) Are you suggesting using the respirator when just mixing the chemicals or, also, when operating the process? I hate those damned respirators when running a process. I know they're not necessary when using weak caustic soda.

(3) Concerning the costs of a caustic soda operation. About 200 pounds of caustic will process 10,000 pounds of film. At about $.25 per pound of caustic, that is a chemical cost of $.005/pound of film. Also, the silver bromide on virgin film was easily converted to Ag2O. What is the chemical cost of oxalic acid, per pound of film? When running film, you have to count your pennies.

(4) Concerning the mylar problem. On certain x-ray films (I can't remember which - it may be only Dryview), a very thin film of transparent mylar is applied on one side of the PET plastic - you can't see it. If this is not removed, the scrap value of the plastic is nil. When selling it, it may take a while for the buyer to catch on, but contamination of mylar will come back to haunt you. Been there - done that.

After stripping everything off and rinsing and drying the plastic chips, the presence of mylar (and dirt, in general) can be tested as follows: Fill a small, shallow, heatable container (we used those standard disposable aluminum weighing dishes - they are about 1/2" deep and 2" to 3" in diameter) about 1/2 full with the clean plastic chips. Heat slowly on a hot plate until the plastic is completely melted (about 500 F). Don't overheat or you will burn the plastic. The melt should be a uniform blue (most of the plastic has a blue color - not all) with no evidence of black particles (mylar, silver bisuthate flakes, or dirt).

NaOH process forms a black colloidal solution of silver which is impossible to filtrate and never will precipitate so you have got to break down the colloidal solution by heating,stirring and settling down for a couple of hours
(5) Who cares? That's not a problem, especially when running large quantities. Usually, the larger the volume, the longer it takes to fill the equipment "pipeline." We were running 50,000 to 80,000 pounds per day. A batch spent about 1-1/2 days in the system, from film to bullion. Our settling times fit easily into this timeframe.

(6) The medical x-ray film scrap industry is in chaos in the US. Dryview has made huge inroads. It is developed by heat instead of by chemicals. To test for Dryview, hold a lighter under a transparent area of a piece of film (the border, e.g.) - with Dryview, the heated spot will turn black. Also, purely digital x-ray equipment is becoming popular - the x-rays are viewed on a monitor - hard copies are only generated when desired. Regular rare earth film scrap is becoming rarer and rarer. In less developed countries, the expensive equipment needed for these other technologies makes their presence less probable - rare earth film is still widely used.

On the other hand, litho film scrap is still alive and kicking. When I ran film, litho made up about 35% of the total volume of all types of film. It comes in 2 thicknesses - 4 mil and 7 mil. About 98% of all litho film is 4 mil. Litho film (4 mil) contains about twice as much silver, per pound, as medical x-ray.

(7) Is the gelatin totally dissolved? In my experience in working with other acids is that it never is totally dissolved. A pound of developed rare earth x-ray film only contains about 1/10 of an ounce of silver, on the average. That's about 1/3 of a cc. The bulk density of the silver powder would be a somewhat less. How much volume of stuff do you get from a pound of film? I repeat - with any residue of emulsion, the sludge will have to be incinerated before it is melted. I am talking about when running large amounts of film. It is a matter of the capacity of the furnaces and of the needed control of the horrible fumes produced when burning the emulsion. It's easier and cheaper to control this with incineration than it is with melting, Also, the carbonaceous emulsion provides a voluminous, variable, additional fuel, which is difficult to deal with in a melt.

there exists a tremendous profit potential for recovering silver versus other precious metals
I totally agree, Lou. The last time I looked, there was as much silver scrap out there as gold scrap, dollar-wise. Also, there are probably 50 times more gold refiners than silver refiners. I love silver. Not because of its beauty, but because it paid the bills for a big part of my life. If someone wants to start another thread, we can discuss this in more detail.
 
Being quite intrigued by this process I dug up some early photo negatives. I don't know what kind of matierial they are made of but roughlly from the 1920s 3x5 single photos and perhaps celuloid not mylar. I don't have access to any xray films.
This test is by no means scientific I know but,
In a nalgene 400ml beaker I brought tap water to a boil added 1 rounded teaspoon of oxalic acid wood bleach. I wrinkled the films so they wouldn't stick together like an old wet book. Within about 2 min. the coatings begain falling off in gobs like dead skin. Within about a half hour and one additional heating in the microwave and ocasional stirring the films were clean.
I have not processed the solution as yet.
I'm impressed by this little test as it is quick and simple. There may be other issues to address such as filtration. I just wonder what someone could accomplish with an old washing machine in a days time.
 
To, me, the question is not whether that oxalic acid will strip it (actually, about anything will strip it - I read once that someone stripped it with very hot water). The question is whether, or not, it would work well and make money in a production situation.

Be careful with that 1920s film. It is very flammable nitrate film and, under the right conditions, it can be explosive.
 
I haven't gone any further with this yet. But if the oxalic breaks down the gelatin and the filtration isn't to much of a problem. This may be worth some scale experiments. Does lye or bleach digest the gelatin?
Good tip on the flamable film. A thin strip of it burns like smokeless gun powder.
 
Modern films may be a far more valid test as it would be no easy task rounding up tons of 20s film. I'll see if I can scrounge up some xrays and try again.
 
Unfortunately, litho film has fallen by the wayside in the developed countries. Newer processes skip the film step to directly produce a metal/polyester plate for printing or utilize inkjet technology in what's known as digital printing.

I am the owner/operator of the remainder of a typesetting/service bureau company. Search the forum for "imagesetter" and you'll find how I disposed of one of my litho film generating machines--dismantled and sold mainly for parts plus some scrap recovery.

In western Europe and North America, litho film usage is primarily in mom-and-pop shops and certain specialty shops. In 3-5 years, it'll probably be history, like the Linotype.

Still used somewhat in the underdeveloped countries.
 
Lou:

Gold and PGM recovering are exactly like marriage:If you are in marriage you want to get out,if you are out of marriage you want to get in.People in gold and PGM recovering want to get out to silver recovering,people that ,we,are in silver recovering want to get in to gold and PGM recovering... It is OK,let us feedback ourselves because we are modern alchemists so we have got to recover all types of precious metals.

You can get used films in three places:

Hospitals (as used radiographies or out of date virgin films).

Newspapers(as used films).

Industrial X ray (as used radiographies or damaged virgin films)

Of course,you can get the spent fixer of these processes too.

I am glad that you are going to experiment the oxalic process,the silver film recovery is a good bussines,welcome to the silver recovery bussines.

Lou,it is my pleasure talking with you.

Best Regards

Manuel
 
Noxx:

It is simple:there are more silver than gold or PGM.When Pachuca´s mines were working the ores contained 300 gr/ton of silver,1.5 gr/ton of gold but silver´s price went down for many years.Recently silver´s price increases due to industrial silver´s uses,so silver recovering become a good bussines.

Have a nice day.

Manuel
 
GSP:

You have nothing for wich apologize,but you are hard to convince,I will answer all your questions and will make you a proposal.

(1)
This guy uses silver nitrate,of course,will form silver oxalate.Metal silver only reacts with concentrated oxalic acid.You will never use concentrated oxalic acid to recover silver from films

(2)
GSP,WE ALL HATE those damned respirators,but you just need it to handle concentrated oxalic acid and to prepare the weak solution,you do not need the mask for running the process.

(3)
Let us count our pennies:Oxalic acid is more expensive than caustic sosa,but weak oxalic acid solution could be reused many times,so the cost goes down,besides,oxalic process is faster than NaOH process,this also goes down cost processing.

(4)
Oxalic and NaOH processes are silver recovery ones,the waste plastic film,in both,could be sell to srcap plastic dealers,they have to recover the plastic,they know what to do,that is their bussines.I provide you a method for recycling the plastic base of films.

(5)
GSP,colloidal solutions are our enemies,they are a nightmare and we have got to avoid them because they never precipitate.Running 50000 or 80000 pounds with oxalic acid process will spend 12 hours from film to bullion.

(6)
We have got to hurry up,film technologies are getting obsolete,digital X ray equipment and CTP technologies point a gun in the middle of our eyes,but there is still a potential because radiographies must be filed for 10 years.

Look,GSP,I propose you to forget all what we have said,take some films and take a half and process them with NaOH,at the same time take the other half and process them with oxalic acid,you will see the difference.

Do not make the same mistake that we,mexicans,do:we have bricks to contruct a wall but...we try to construct a pyramid!,the result is that we do not construct the wall...neither the pyramid..so I strongly suggest you to construct the wall first,then construct the pyramid and I am sure you will construct a very hig building.Do not worry about the pounds of film you
have,this process works well even you have 1,100,1000 or 100000 pounds of film.

Regards

Manuel
 

Latest posts

Back
Top