Anyone using the term monoatomic is either a liar or a person that's been listening to a liar.
There is NO such thing as "new assay methodology." Fire assay has been essentially the same for centuries, with only a few improvements. Anyone using the term, "new assay methodology", and is saying that it is different than traditional assaying is a liar or a person that's been listening to a liar. If a traditional fire assay, done by an experienced assayer, shows only a small amount of gold, that is absolute, 100% proof, that there is only a small amount of gold in the ore. No ifs, ands, or buts. There is absolutely no such thing as "immature" or "embryonic" gold that must be treated differently to make it "mature."
How do you know you got .5% gold in your microwave? Please explain in detail.
We're trying to protect you from scams and the "100% false alchemical chemistry, with no exceptions" that has been around for many centuries.
Please notice the first quote in my signature below, "It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise, than for a man to hear the song of fools." This was posted primarily for people that are getting sucked into alchemical lies - people like you.