• Please join our new sister site dedicated to discussion of gold, silver, platinum, copper and palladium bar, coin, jewelry collecting/investing/storing/selling/buying. It would be greatly appreciated if you joined and help add a few new topics for new people to engage in.

    Bullion.Forum

Gold refining method selection question

Gold Refining Forum

Help Support Gold Refining Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

AlkalineHume

New member
Joined
Dec 17, 2024
Messages
1
Location
USA
Hi folks, I've been reading and digesting a lot of info from the forum and trying to understand how the different methods for gold refining work at scale as well. Looking at the most common methods (Miller chlorination, inquartation/parting, aqua regia, and Wohlwill) I was trying to sketch out when/why refiners would use one method over another, presuming they have access to equipment for all of them. This is the best I could come up with. Granted there are plenty of variations within each category, but I was hoping to get the broad strokes right. I wanted to bounce it off this forum to see if I've understood the main considerations in selecting one route over another or if I'm missing a key consideration or completely off. In other words, please roast my slide!

My assumptions are mostly as follows:
1. Miller is preferred for cost reasons provided the inputs and purity required are compatible.
2. Wohlwill is least preferred unless >99.99% is required and the input must be pre-refined to >98%
3. Between IQ-P and AR, IQ-P would be preferred where possible

Please roast those assumptions as well. Thanks in advance for any feedback!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-03-12 123205.png
    Screenshot 2025-03-12 123205.png
    57 KB
Hi folks, I've been reading and digesting a lot of info from the forum and trying to understand how the different methods for gold refining work at scale as well. Looking at the most common methods (Miller chlorination, inquartation/parting, aqua regia, and Wohlwill) I was trying to sketch out when/why refiners would use one method over another, presuming they have access to equipment for all of them. This is the best I could come up with. Granted there are plenty of variations within each category, but I was hoping to get the broad strokes right. I wanted to bounce it off this forum to see if I've understood the main considerations in selecting one route over another or if I'm missing a key consideration or completely off. In other words, please roast my slide!

My assumptions are mostly as follows:
1. Miller is preferred for cost reasons provided the inputs and purity required are compatible.
2. Wohlwill is least preferred unless >99.99% is required and the input must be pre-refined to >98%
3. Between IQ-P and AR, IQ-P would be preferred where possible

Please roast those assumptions as well. Thanks in advance for any feedback!
Welcome.
Additionally the raw material dictates much when a prosess is selected.
The Miller Chlorination was selected for dore and similar all metallic raw material, as the Chlorine bubbled through the material will convert all but precious metals to slag.

I don't know how much it's used anymore.
For dore with much Silver inquarting must be done and so on.

What kind of material do you have access to?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top