Titration of Cyanide Solutions.
Yeah, that is roughly what they did. But also very sensitive qualitative CN tests were negative. That is why I am interested in the method Ultrax described. And how they know that there is any organic substance in it.Titration of Cyanide Solutions.
I do not know the details exactly, but as far as i know, it also work in glass vessels on regular daylight, where passage of UV isnt very good. They used it according to the manual and measured the CN content along the way. But they didn't found any.Did they expose it to sufficient UV in the lab tests. According to what I found when researching eco-goldex, it is the ferricyanide and/or ferrocyanide that does the work, but it requires UV light to break the iron bond and free the CN-.
Dave
Sorry for the confusion, I'm simplifying a bit for the forumMy point is how we determine CN- anion in the powder or solution via XRF. We all know very well that anything below Mg is hard to measure by XRF due to small atomic radius. C and N are way off from the magnesium, much lighter. I am just intrigued how they measured it. Powder diffraction ? Does CN- have specific pattern on powder XRF reading ?
Also, if it is encapsuled CN- with organic additives, how you distinguish carbon from that encapsulation from CN- carbon.
Guys from one mining company tested the EcoGoldex in certified lab by certified methods for CN- detection, but they found no free CN- in the solution. That is why I am intrigued about Ultrax method to prove/disprove free cyanide in EG.
Thanks for explanationSorry for the confusion, I'm simplifying a bit for the forum
It is quite obvious that we use a laboratory and complex physicochemical multi-stage method for determining the composition. XRF is used to determine the type of complexing agent, not CN ligands (and by the way with XRF we can start with Na, not Mg Further we use other methods - sorry, they are under NDA.
I can only say that in the EcoGoldex solution works free CN groups, just like in ordinary cyanide
In general, we have had more problems with recycling and decomposition of waste after EcoGoldex than after ordinary cyanide
Keep it simple and do what nature does, is usually the best way to go. 2 words...ball mill. I usually mill about 3 tons a week of black sands and sulfides to 400 mesh. That will release 95% of gold that is locked up and run it back over the table. 5 tons a day, is going to require a larger ball mill than I have but it will be the same process, no chemicals needed.
run the ore, crush, and extract. what's not collectible, put in ball mill, grind to 400 mesh, extract again on table. regrind and crush as needed to ensure all (or most) of gold is extracted...wash, rinse, repeat... It's the same process mother nature uses and by far the most cost effective.
Simple effective DIY ball mill idea to process 5 tons or more a day..... cement mixer, steel balls and water. (but it can be done dry, wet is faster and more effective and easier on the equipment) You want to use roughly 1/2 the weight in steel balls as what you're grinding. 1000 lbs black sands, 500 lbs steel balls...2000 lbs black sands, 1000 lbs steel balls, etc. I use a DIY ball mill from a small cement mixer and 200 lbs steel balls, processes about 1000 lbs a day and about 3 tons per week.
keep it simple.
Do you use portable XRF with start detecting from Mg? Just curiousThanks for explanation
Not sure what that's supposed to say. -50 mesh is easily collected on the table. Most of the gold I was referring to is going to be -150 or still locked in black sands and/or sulfides. Grinding in the ball mill extracts down to 400 mesh, easily retrieving the 1 oz+/ton in the original post. It's specifically for not using chemicals because processing 5 tons/day will run into millions $$$ IF anyone can get a permit for cyanide leaching.
I am not sure if it can do Na, but it shows Mg, and Geochem shoot quite OK the bulk of constituents of matrix... OLYMPUS Vanta better advertised than really functioning sharp step from older Elvax or NITON devices thoDo you use portable XRF with start detecting from Mg? Just curious
Gold is never in the crystal lattice of magnetite - usually, it is hydrothermal co-precipitation (in the geological sense) in which gold particles are physically overgrown with hydroxides and iron oxides, binding very firmly precisely mechanically (!).Keep it simple and do what nature does, is usually the best way to go. 2 words...ball mill. I usually mill about 3 tons a week of black sands and sulfides to 400 mesh. That will release 95% of gold that is locked up and run it back over the table. 5 tons a day, is going to require a larger ball mill than I have but it will be the same process, no chemicals needed.
run the ore, crush, and extract. what's not collectible, put in ball mill, grind to 400 mesh, extract again on table. regrind and crush as needed to ensure all (or most) of gold is extracted...wash, rinse, repeat... It's the same process mother nature uses and by far the most cost effective.
Simple effective DIY ball mill idea to process 5 tons or more a day..... cement mixer, steel balls and water. (but it can be done dry, wet is faster and more effective and easier on the equipment) You want to use roughly 1/2 the weight in steel balls as what you're grinding. 1000 lbs black sands, 500 lbs steel balls...2000 lbs black sands, 1000 lbs steel balls, etc. I use a DIY ball mill from a small cement mixer and 200 lbs steel balls, processes about 1000 lbs a day and about 3 tons per week.
keep it simple.
interesting...Gold is never in the crystal lattice of magnetite - usually, it is hydrothermal co-precipitation (in the geological sense) in which gold particles are physically overgrown with hydroxides and iron oxides, binding very firmly precisely mechanically (!).
No amount of crushing by pressure (let aside mill with steel balls) will help free these gold particles from hydroxide shells. Moreover, oxides are often covered with a dense layer of organic bitumens - which make magnetite generally insensitive to any(!) acids or mechanical actions. Even roasting at 700-800C does not help 100%. So practically, such magnetite totally does not dissolve in anything without an autoclave and very aggressive oxygen oxidation. We have such type of ore (ferroaurates), and we were able to wash off bitumens coating from ferroaurates only with xylene - and then only partially.
Therefore, if you have ferroaurate (gold in magnetite), your only way is chemical leaching after opening the magnetite.
Opening the magnetite is a more complex problem than opening the sulfides. You can find the best solution on your specific ore in practice.
Did they expose it to sufficient UV in the lab tests. According to what I found when researching eco-goldex, it is the ferricyanide and/or ferrocyanide that does the work, but it requires UV light to break the iron bond and free the CN-.
Dave
Gold is never in the crystal lattice of magnetite - usually, it is hydrothermal co-precipitation (in the geological sense) in which gold particles are physically overgrown with hydroxides and iron oxides, binding very firmly precisely mechanically (!).
No amount of crushing by pressure (let aside mill with steel balls) will help free these gold particles from hydroxide shells. Moreover, oxides are often covered with a dense layer of organic bitumens - which make magnetite generally insensitive to any(!) acids or mechanical actions. Even roasting at 700-800C does not help 100%. So practically, such magnetite totally does not dissolve in anything without an autoclave and very aggressive oxygen oxidation. We have such type of ore (ferroaurates), and we were able to wash off bitumens coating from ferroaurates only with xylene - and then only partially.
Therefore, if you have ferroaurate (gold in magnetite), your only way is chemical leaching after opening the magnetite.
Opening the magnetite is a more complex problem than opening the sulfides. You can find the best solution on your specific ore in practice.
So what is the 'embrittling agent' ??? Any ideasMethod for the assay and recovery of precious metals
Patent, US5238485A.
Abstract
Complex ores of the precious metals which also contain iron spinels and similar compounds are assayed and their precious metals content is extracted by subjecting the ores or concentrates thereof together with an iron-embrittling agent to a pyrometallurgical process which reduces at least a major portion of the iron compounds to liquid metallic iron.
The liquid iron serves as a collector metal for the precious metals and, after cooling, the iron is brittle and easily comminuted and can be separated from the precious metals through use of either an electrolytic process or a selective chemical dissolution of the iron and other base metals leaving the precious metals available for analysis and recovery.
My point is how we determine CN- anion in the powder or solution via XRF. We all know very well that anything below Mg is hard to measure by XRF due to small atomic radius. C and N are way off from the magnesium, much lighter. I am just intrigued how they measured it. Powder diffraction ? Does CN- have specific pattern on powder XRF reading ?
Also, if it is encapsuled CN- with organic additives, how you distinguish carbon from that encapsulation from CN- carbon.
Guys from one mining company tested the EcoGoldex in certified lab by certified methods for CN- detection, but they found no free CN- in the solution. That is why I am intrigued about Ultrax method to prove/disprove free cyanide in EG.
Dissolve PGM in molten iron as a collector? Did the author of US5238485A even see the state diagram of the Au-Fe system? This is obvious economic madness Author filed a patent for the sake of the patent itself9
So what is the 'embrittling agent' ??? Any ideas
Both steel and cast iron are made from the same mineral, cast iron comes in many grades some of which are easier the break than others.9
So what is the 'embrittling agent' ??? Any ideas
AgreeDissolve PGM in molten iron as a collector? Did the author of US5238485A even see the state diagram of the Au-Fe system? This is obvious economic madness Author filed a patent for the sake of the patent itself
P. S. Yes it is possible to collect gold in matte from sulfide ore (it's old multi-stage Hungarian medieval technology) but molten iron is NOT a matte.
Enter your email address to join: