NoIdea
Well-known member
Dear All, my absence has not been in vain as I am trying a new process that uses way less chemicals and has been very effective in dissolving all base metals quickly leaving behind the gold and other PM's, interested?
Drafting this process can get rather confusing and still has a few question that need answering, so your help will be invaluable. It might take me awhile to get it all on paper as I have this amazing ability to digress with ease, which may add to the confusion.
Process Material:
Anything containing visible PM's and silver, for example, gold and silver coated pins/plugs, IC's and flat packs, TO type packages, laser diodes, LED's, solder silver/lead, tantalum capacitors, any small surface mounted components, silver ribbon, keyboard Mylar's, x-ray and photos, etc.
Pyrolysis:
Nothing new hear except when doing Mylar's, x-rays, and photo's they need to be placed on the bottom of the reactor as the silver/silver oxide becomes mobile in the pyrolysis gases phase. Years ago I pyrolyzed a bunch of Mylar's and photos, to my surprise the silver precipitated or phase changed into a solid mass close to the gas exit point. I'm not sure how much silver was lost butt it made me weary when it comes to their placement within the reactor, at the bottom the silver has a better chance of precipitating within the system rather than being lost with the pyrolysis gases.
Grinding/Washing:
Objective here is to grind the charcoal/fibre glass, left after pyrolysis, to a size that will allow washing to remove most of it through density floatation leaving the denser metals behind. The charcoal residue is kept and will be dealt with at a later time.
DO NOT ASH THE PYROLYZED MATERIAL.
DO NOT REMOVE MAGNETIC MATERIAL
The Reactor:
This next part has eluded me for years, yet has been a visual part of my studies, butt just couldn't see it. The reactivity series gave me a clue as to what might be happening, though allot of what I'm about to present has allot of assumptions an speculations that need confirming.
For years I have been trying to dissolve the base metals, excluding iron, with sulphuric acid, talk about slow. Then it clicked, a self sustaining electrochemical cell without external electricity. We are all aware of the iron/copper battery that can be made using a lemon/orange as the cell, well what do you think will happen if you wrapped a piece of copper wire around a nail and then drop this into dilute sulphuric acid? Yep the cell is shorted out and both the copper and iron dissolve, however any copper that is dissolved will reduce back to copper when it come into contact with the iron and will keep doing this until the iron is gone. Now, lets say we put the washed pyrolyzed material into a shallow tray and add dilute sulphuric acid, just enough to half cover it, now just walk away and let it do its thing. Any metals that are electrochemically different with react with each other. The reactivity series shows that copper is the least reactive base metal and as such any copper sulphate produced will soon be reduced back to copper as a very very fine power due to the more reactive metals present. However when the free acid is consumed, we are left with a iron/nickel sulphate electrolyte which still enables the cell to continue, butt instead of producing copper sulphate, copper(I) oxide is thrown down as a fine light brown/orange precipitate along with finely divided iron oxide (orange rusted) which can be removed by adding water or old iron/nickel sulphate solution and shacking/swirling the tray(like you would when panning), the light brown looking mud just stays in suspension and is easily poured off into a bucked (keep this aside and ill show you later how to recover the copper) making sure none of the denser material is allowed to follow, this is why a bucket is used so if by chance some of the heavier material does end up in the bucket it will sit on the bottom. Now if you keep the reactor material damp with the iron/nickel sulphate solution the reactor will keep dissolving the base metals and more material can be added. Now this is where it starts to get interesting, instead of using the iron/nickel sulphate to wash the reactor tray, we use dilute sulphuric acid then a white precipitate is formed containing lead and silver sulphate and is way less dense than the brown precipitate and can easily be separated through sedimentation. So it would seem that using the iron/nickel sulphate wash suppresses the formation of lead and silver sulphate.
Gunna take a break now as my head is going fuzzy :?
Regards
Deano
Drafting this process can get rather confusing and still has a few question that need answering, so your help will be invaluable. It might take me awhile to get it all on paper as I have this amazing ability to digress with ease, which may add to the confusion.
Process Material:
Anything containing visible PM's and silver, for example, gold and silver coated pins/plugs, IC's and flat packs, TO type packages, laser diodes, LED's, solder silver/lead, tantalum capacitors, any small surface mounted components, silver ribbon, keyboard Mylar's, x-ray and photos, etc.
Pyrolysis:
Nothing new hear except when doing Mylar's, x-rays, and photo's they need to be placed on the bottom of the reactor as the silver/silver oxide becomes mobile in the pyrolysis gases phase. Years ago I pyrolyzed a bunch of Mylar's and photos, to my surprise the silver precipitated or phase changed into a solid mass close to the gas exit point. I'm not sure how much silver was lost butt it made me weary when it comes to their placement within the reactor, at the bottom the silver has a better chance of precipitating within the system rather than being lost with the pyrolysis gases.
Grinding/Washing:
Objective here is to grind the charcoal/fibre glass, left after pyrolysis, to a size that will allow washing to remove most of it through density floatation leaving the denser metals behind. The charcoal residue is kept and will be dealt with at a later time.
DO NOT ASH THE PYROLYZED MATERIAL.
DO NOT REMOVE MAGNETIC MATERIAL
The Reactor:
This next part has eluded me for years, yet has been a visual part of my studies, butt just couldn't see it. The reactivity series gave me a clue as to what might be happening, though allot of what I'm about to present has allot of assumptions an speculations that need confirming.
For years I have been trying to dissolve the base metals, excluding iron, with sulphuric acid, talk about slow. Then it clicked, a self sustaining electrochemical cell without external electricity. We are all aware of the iron/copper battery that can be made using a lemon/orange as the cell, well what do you think will happen if you wrapped a piece of copper wire around a nail and then drop this into dilute sulphuric acid? Yep the cell is shorted out and both the copper and iron dissolve, however any copper that is dissolved will reduce back to copper when it come into contact with the iron and will keep doing this until the iron is gone. Now, lets say we put the washed pyrolyzed material into a shallow tray and add dilute sulphuric acid, just enough to half cover it, now just walk away and let it do its thing. Any metals that are electrochemically different with react with each other. The reactivity series shows that copper is the least reactive base metal and as such any copper sulphate produced will soon be reduced back to copper as a very very fine power due to the more reactive metals present. However when the free acid is consumed, we are left with a iron/nickel sulphate electrolyte which still enables the cell to continue, butt instead of producing copper sulphate, copper(I) oxide is thrown down as a fine light brown/orange precipitate along with finely divided iron oxide (orange rusted) which can be removed by adding water or old iron/nickel sulphate solution and shacking/swirling the tray(like you would when panning), the light brown looking mud just stays in suspension and is easily poured off into a bucked (keep this aside and ill show you later how to recover the copper) making sure none of the denser material is allowed to follow, this is why a bucket is used so if by chance some of the heavier material does end up in the bucket it will sit on the bottom. Now if you keep the reactor material damp with the iron/nickel sulphate solution the reactor will keep dissolving the base metals and more material can be added. Now this is where it starts to get interesting, instead of using the iron/nickel sulphate to wash the reactor tray, we use dilute sulphuric acid then a white precipitate is formed containing lead and silver sulphate and is way less dense than the brown precipitate and can easily be separated through sedimentation. So it would seem that using the iron/nickel sulphate wash suppresses the formation of lead and silver sulphate.
Gunna take a break now as my head is going fuzzy :?
Regards
Deano