MiltonFu said:
You didnt know, yet you posted it. Some members advised you kindly, yet you are trying to justify the use of incorrect data for your own benefit. If the data stated that the yields were mediocre, you would not have used the information.. Just remove it from your auction. End of story.
It's too late to modify the listing...there's less than four hours left and I cannot edit, add information to the listing, or end it....I will simply contact the winning bidder and notify them about this forum and the links mentioned below. There will be a time lapse after the auction ends and having to pay so they can still back out.
I just have to say this to those who attacked me right away, I am a top-rated seller; being honest is part of getting there.
Like I mentioned earlier, I had no idea whatsoever about the authenticity of the document in question. Nobody had warned me until about 2 hours ago when I received a message through an eBay member who is part of this forum.
Conversation:
That person said to me that the gold content was highly inaccurate.
So I replied with "That is why we urge our buyers to research for themselves."
Then they replied with: "I understand.However someone on our forum posted a link to your auction,because we have been aware of that list for several years.Our forum is "Gold Refining Forum".Because you have this as an auction and not a buy it now,I feel you will recieve a fair price for them,based on actual market value."
Therefore, I personally became concerned and did a google search to find the link and that is why I am here to find answers. That should demonstrate that as an honest ebay seller, I wanted to figure out what the fuss was about and possibly correct what was incorrect if needed. It is obvious that I have no knowledge whatsoever about CPU gold contents and instead of being educated with information PROVING why the document was incorrect, I am being attacked for being deceptive and dishonest. Just because I am using a document that 'was proven long ago to be flawed', how am I suppose to know that?
I am also not going to accept forum member's words at face value and since I was not made aware of anything contradicting the document's claims about gold content in CPU's I performed a search on this site and found this: http://goldrefiningforum.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=11562&p=113117 and finally this: http://goldrefiningforum.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=60&t=62&p=52836
So after skimming through them, and seeing one member do an actual gold scrap on a Pentium pro and the other member who did it on a bunch of other lower yield CPU's I am able to understand now, why the scribd document is REALLY INCORRECT. Now I can actually go ahead and acknowledge that the listing needs to be corrected.
-Joe
PS. I admit that when I posted these CPU's I was in a rush to get them done and maybe if I would have taken more time Googling this topic I would have found this site and the actual results from someone who did it themselves.
PSS. And thanks again for being jerks....I will never forget this forum's warm welcoming as I have become a bit interested recently in gold refining myself.