eeTHr
Well-known member
infinatesorrow---
In your long post, you brought up many things. None of which was the point that I and others were presenting to you.
Instead, you claimed that we were stating reasoning other than that which we actually were. This is formally known as the Straw Man Fallacy rebuttal, which use is to merely appear to win an argument, regardless of the logic presented to you.
The question arises, that if you are smart enough to write all those premises and conclusions, then doesn't that make you smart enough to communicate accurately, if you really wanted to?
A conclusion could be made that intelligence is not always proportional to wisdom. Another could be that attitude is a function of intent.
In your long post, you brought up many things. None of which was the point that I and others were presenting to you.
Instead, you claimed that we were stating reasoning other than that which we actually were. This is formally known as the Straw Man Fallacy rebuttal, which use is to merely appear to win an argument, regardless of the logic presented to you.
The question arises, that if you are smart enough to write all those premises and conclusions, then doesn't that make you smart enough to communicate accurately, if you really wanted to?
A conclusion could be made that intelligence is not always proportional to wisdom. Another could be that attitude is a function of intent.