jimdoc said:
I think a pay site will make these guys feel more entitled to have questions answered the way they want.
That's an excellent point. Considering all of us volunteer, we can maintain any posture we prefer, but if we sell our services, we are then at their mercy.
They should just get banned with no excuses. Post a big red warning telling people about the rules,and if they break them,they are gone.If that is too harsh,maybe a three strike rule.
I had reconsidered my approach to banning some time ago when I suspended one reader. He was adamant that he be re-instated immediately, which was denied. Even though his two weeks expired, he has not returned to the board under his old identity.
Our purpose in banning isn't to prevent readers from accessing the site. My objective is to make them understand that they can't come to this forum and be disruptive. If spelling it out doesn't work, banning is a very useful tool in conveying the message. As in this case, it also discloses the willingness of an individual to be cooperative. If testosterone is their answer to problems, they are not welcome here. It is clear to me that when the monkeys run the zoo, those that have value to the forum will have long since left.
I would like to thank all of you for your support in this issue. While it may appear that I am on a power trip, my sole purpose is in trying to keep this forum in such a condition that it is useful. In order to do that, we must keep a tight reign------otherwise we will quickly be overwhelmed by those that enjoy raising hell, with no regard to the rights of others that prefer a more gentile atmosphere.
Harold