The turn out part was after this video the client cut me a check! After that came a NDA.I watched that close for a long time waiting to see how it turned out. I also didn’t want to suggest someone else’s idea, but glad you brought it up.
This is a problem I see often, solution getting hot. It is always an issue of the electricalContacts need to be maintained squeaky clean to prevent overheating.
Nice, I have never even heard of dielectric paint, but I have seen many situations where it would have been a big help.I always try to get clients to apply dielectric paint once good connections are made
Would this occur while replenishing the electrolyte or does it occur from the high voltages and amperage's in some way?acidification of the electrolyte can be a concern
Melting, casting, cleaning, weighing, assaying, cleaning crucibles, can be surprisingly costlyThanks for that tip. For a medium to large producer, the labor is the same if you manually harvest 300 or 1500 ounces from each cell and despite the cost of gold invested to improve the contact efficiency, the benefits in production without increased labor would eventually justify it.
Never heard a silver refiner complain about having to cast more anodes to keep up with cell production.
Not from replenishing the electrolyte, but from daily running of the cells. It depends on the elements contained. High amounts of gold is probably the worst culprit.Would this occur while replenishing the electrolyte or does it occur from the high voltages and amperage's in some way?
Poor electrical contacts start fires.This is a problem I see often, solution getting hot. It is always an issue of the electrical
contact and always creeps back in to the picture. I always try to get clients to apply dielectric paint once good connections are made or at least dielectric grease to maintain good contacts.
What, if anything, have you seen used to maintain the contact integrity especially when cranking up the power?
Yes but also standard operations for a melt shop. The one thing is the Moebius always requires remelting of anode stubs. That can account for 20% of the anode production.Melting, casting, cleaning, weighing, assaying, cleaning crucibles, can be surprisingly costly
4metals said:I’d like to see some background to that statement. May be true, I haven’t seen it.A Moebius cell can usually output slightly higher purity.
20% stubbage or remelt rate should be at the very top end of the spectrum. It is very much up to the philosophy of the refiner, but with a small amount of extra care and work, stubbage can be reduced to as little as 2.5%. I liked going with the lower remelt rate since all stubs were washed free of any adhering gold slimes and dried before recasting to anodes. Smaller stubs made this washing much easier and faster.Yes but also standard operations for a melt shop. The one thing is the Moebius always requires remelting of anode stubs. That can account for 20% of the anode production.
Assaying is usually done on large melts as a composite because the bars are all settled and belong to the refiner so a large melt coupled with a stacked mold makes many anodes and fewer assays.
Care has to be taken not to count the anode stubs as new feed into the system. Especially if they are not logged out as remelt stubs. I had a client do that once, the accountants didn’t know what was logged in and not logged out because it was a remelt and cast not new feed. They thought they had massive losses when they really had poor accounting.
Thanks, nice to be back.Well, I've spent the last week looking back through my books, and I haven't found it. As I remember, the logic was that with a Thum cell you have crystals growing on top of crystals at all different angles, and in some places they can entrain small amounts of electrolyte with whatever contamination it might carry. Because of this overlapping structure, they are also harder to rinse completely clean. With a Moebius cell, the crystals are constantly being knocked down before this can happen, and they are easier to rinse.
Mudville9, do you have any feedback on this? By the way, it's nice to see you posting again!
Dave
Do a literature search. There is a paper that tells you where to keep your maximum electrolyte Pd PPM for minimal dissolution of the Pd anode.Do you have experience on how high palladium content could be in the anodes, and after electrorefining, what proportion will end up in electrolyte and what proportion goes to the slimes and "fine" silver ?
I have one feed material that averages around 1% Pd and I try to gain some insight on how it could be effectively refined to obtain pure silver and palladium "something" in the end
Enter your email address to join: